Search for: "State v. De Witt"
Results 21 - 40
of 102
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2021, 9:30 pm
The intermingling of Industry 3.0 and 4.0 represents the state of matters in the current period of digitalisation of work. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 4:36 am
The rights of third-country nationals migrating to the EU have largely been constructed under the terms of Part Three, Title V, Chapter 3 TFEU, particularly arts 78-79 thereof. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 9:00 pm
For an outline of the proposition, see the State of California’s voter website. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 7:13 am
Article IV also clearly states that such decisions are to be taken by the Ministerial Council in accordance with the specific requirements for “decision-making” in the WTO Agreement, or in any of the covered multilateral trade agreements. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 12:38 am
V. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 3:00 am
Furthermore, the arbitrary choice to exclude two major telecom equipment providers on the basis of unsubstantiated allegations of foreign government influence, severely upsets the desired balance between the free movement of goods and a State’s security interests. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
They are very much part of the geographical territory of a sovereign State. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 2:49 am
The reasoning of the General Court equates de facto the application of State aid control to a mere conformity control on the application of domestic law by tax authorities. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 6:47 am
It covers all types of imports and exports of products.[2] Any national measure enacted by Member States which has the effect of hindering, directly or indirectly, actually or potentially, trade in the internal market is to be considered as having an effect equivalent to quantitative restrictions.[3] The Court of Justice of the European Union [“CJEU”] has explained that national measures subjecting the internal trade of goods to prior authorization restrict access to the market… [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 2:52 pm
” Instead, the Framers drafted a Constitution that required the Senate’s “Advice and Consent” for the appointment of “Officers of the United States. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 5:00 am
[iv] The General Court of EU in Hardware (Guangzhou) v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 5:00 am
One implication is that this could apply to state-owned enterprises. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 2:41 am
As a consequence, courts were urged to develop the notion of frustration of the contract, which allows for termination of an agreement when the circumstances are “in a fundamental respect different from those which were envisaged”.6)In the definition of Davis Contractos Ltd. v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 3:15 am
Hearthside Baking, Scafom International BV v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 5:51 am
At the Ontario Labour Relations Board, Foodora contended the riders were independent contractors (as stated in the contract signed by the parties). [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 10:01 am
India unlike civil law countries like the United States[2], Germany[3] and France[4] does not codify the definition of force majeure into any legislation. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 2:56 pm
State Power First and foremost, states currently retain power to decide who stays home and for how long. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
Mazars and Trump v. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 9:18 am
A similar dispute arose later in the Djibouti v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 10:09 am
Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances, case C‑363/18, judgement of 12 November 2019) concerning the interpretation of Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 on the provision of food information to consumers. [read post]
