Search for: "State v. District Court of Ninth Judicial District" Results 21 - 40 of 1,538
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2022, 1:30 pm by Eugene Volokh
The Supreme Court has vacated the judgment of this Court and remanded this case to us "for further consideration in light of New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 1:51 pm by WIMS
On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona [See WIMS 2/10/12]. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 1:35 pm by Jason Mazzone
The Court of Appeals, in disagreement with the contrary conclusions of the Supreme Court of the State of California and of a United States District Court, ordered habeas corpus relief granted to set aside the conviction of Joshua Richter, respondent here. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 8:01 am by Todd Henderson
The district court, and then the Ninth Circuit, believed they found a clever way to resolve the case without getting into the messy tribal-state-federal politics. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 5:02 am by zshapiro
But Section 3174, allows the Judicial Counsel of the Circuit, in this case the Ninth Circuit, upon the request of the chief judge of the District Court to suspend the deadlines. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 9:19 am by Federalist Society
This case presented two questions regarding the power of bankruptcy courts: One, does Article III of the Constitution permit bankruptcy courts to exercise the judicial power of the United States on the basis of litigant consent--and if so, can consent be implied by litigant conduct? [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 9:19 am by Federalist Society
This case presented two questions regarding the power of bankruptcy courts: One, does Article III of the Constitution permit bankruptcy courts to exercise the judicial power of the United States on the basis of litigant consent--and if so, can consent be implied by litigant conduct? [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 4:04 pm
Different district courts within the Ninth Circuit followed different approaches. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 8:30 am by Steven G. Pearl
KeyBank, N.A., 673 F.3d 947 (3/7/12), the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals weighed in on the question of the day: the impact of the Supreme Court's decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
  United States District Courts in California oversee some of the largest caseloads in the country.[1] Understandably reluctant to see their dockets expand, these courts often look for grounds to remand cases to state court. [read post]
5 May 2013, 1:56 pm
What this Means: Unfortunately this means that some litigation that could have been handled by the bankruptcy court may instead be diverted to District or State Courts. [read post]
2 May 2012, 10:33 pm by Jonathan Hafetz
The Ninth Circuit today reversed the district court’s ruling in Padilla v. [read post]