Search for: "State v. District Court of the Sixth Judicial Dist."
Results 21 - 40
of 81
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2022, 9:32 pm
Decided on June 3, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, PERADOTTO, AND WINSLOW, JJ. 516 CA 21-00840 [*1]IN THE MATTER OF DANA HENSLEY, ON BEHALF OF HER MINOR CHILDREN AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, ET AL., PETITIONERS-PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, vWILLIAMSVILLE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL., RESPONDENTS-DEFENDANTS, ANDREW M. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:32 pm
Decided on June 3, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, PERADOTTO, AND WINSLOW, JJ. 516 CA 21-00840 [*1]IN THE MATTER OF DANA HENSLEY, ON BEHALF OF HER MINOR CHILDREN AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, ET AL., PETITIONERS-PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, vWILLIAMSVILLE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL., RESPONDENTS-DEFENDANTS, ANDREW M. [read post]
27 May 2010, 3:47 am
District courts within the Sixth Circuit are also divided as to whether the good faith exception applies. [read post]
11 May 2018, 11:31 am
State v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 6:12 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 5:15 am
Sixth Judicial Dist. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm
Gaas, Sumit Kumar Arora, for Cash Zone, LLC dba Cash Biz, Appellant.Appeal from the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, Trial Court No. 2015-CI-01545, Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding.REVERSED AND RENDERED; REMANDED FOR ARBITRATION.Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice, Rebeca C. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:47 pm
Because the district court neither erred in dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint nor abused its discretion in denying Plaintiffs' motion for relief, we affirm the district court's decisions in their entirety. 08a0006p.06 Pontiac School Dist v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 7:19 am
State v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 10:43 am
Despite being approved by the State Legislature in 1990, Builder’s Remedy remains judicially untested. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Schuette v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
Sixth Dist. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 6:36 am
State v. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 9:57 am
Sixth Judicial Dist. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 11:37 am
See Crawford v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, October 27, 2008 US v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
The District Court will hear the case. [read post]
2 May 2019, 6:27 am
”) Celestino v. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 11:58 am
In a lengthy opinion filed February 22, and belatedly ordered published on March 25, 2019, the First District Court of Appeal (Div. 1) affirmed the trial court’s judgment denying a petition for writ of mandate challenging the EIR for a mixed use business and residential project (the “5M Project”) on 4 acres in downtown San Francisco. [read post]
