Search for: "State v. Eady"
Results 21 - 40
of 285
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2018, 4:11 pm
Sir David Eady stayed the action in England & Wales on the basis that Scotland is the more appropriate forum. [read post]
16 May 2011, 11:52 am
” In addressing this issue, Eady J referred to Attorney-General v Guardian Newspapers (No 2) [1990] 1 AC 109, where the House of Lords had drawn a distinction between state secrets and confidential information relating to an individual’s private life. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:18 am
1538: Aidan O’Neill QC submits that the role of this court is to rebalance the constitution. 1530: Aidan O’Neill QC refers to the decision in Padfield v Minister of Agriculture at page 1061 of the decision. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 4:07 pm
These offers went unanswered until the second day of the trial when the Defendant indicated, as Sir David Eady puts it, that “she was prepared (too late) to accept it. [read post]
7 May 2010, 4:21 am
Eady, 733 A.2d 112, 116 n.7 (Conn.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1030 (1999); State v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:03 pm
Censorship by judges, or by any other state official, is quite contrary to our tradition. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 6:50 am
Now, the situation is not helped by Eady going into too much detail. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
Eadie QC: yes. 15.20 Eadie QC submits that Parliament set up a legislative scheme under the 1972 Act by way that actions by the UK Government and those of other member states flow back to affect member states. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm
On the same day Mr Justice Eady gave judgment in the case of Auladin v Shaikh ([2013] EWHC 157 (QB)). [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 4:25 pm
On 21 March 2018 Sir David Eady handed down judgment in the case of AXB v BXA [2018] EWHC 588 (QB). [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:31 am
The Court of Appeal’s scepticism of as to Eady J’s approach (determining imputations of fact on the basis of verifiability) has, moreover, been queried by the Supreme Court in Joseph v Spiller [114]. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 10:04 am
Eady J held that the defences of qualified privilege and a “fair comment” were not arguable. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 12:07 am
The Court dismissed the appeal and upheld Eady J’s judgment below. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 4:07 pm
On 17 May 2010 Mr Justice Eady stayed the action on the ground that it would involve an illegitimate inquiry into issues of religious doctrine (HH Sant Baba Jeet Singh Ji Maharaj v Eastern Media Group & Anor [2010] EWHC 1294 (QB)). [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 6:04 am
"It's stated in the curriculum that it's meant to shape the way that they view the world, it's meant to shape the way that they make life decisions," Eady says. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 4:05 pm
As Eady J said Sunderland Housing Group v Baines ([2006] EWHC 2359 (QB) ) “It seems to me at least right for a defendant who seeks to resist an injunction against publication of defamatory words to identify the defamatory meaning or meanings which he intends to justify and also to state in a witness statement verified by a statement of truth that he believes in the truth of the words in that meaning or those meanings. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:12 pm
Mountain States Mut. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 2:02 am
Eady J stated: It seems to me at least right for a defendant who seeks to resist an injunction against publication of defamatory words to identify the defamatory meaning or meanings which he intends to justify, and also to state in a witness statement verified by a statement of truth that he believes in the truth of the words in that meaning or those meanings. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:19 am
The judge stated that the court must determine whether there is a real and substantial tort by reference to the tort complained of in the Particulars of Claim. [read post]
