Search for: "State v. Eisenstein"
Results 21 - 40
of 69
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
At 11 a.m., the Court will hear argument in Eisenstein v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
Redding (08-479) — constitutionality of strip-searching a student at a public school in search of drugs Eisenstein v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:24 pm
Eisenstein, 96 N.Y.2d 164, 166, 750 N.E.2d 67 (2001) (citing Glamm v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 4:21 am
They also wanted Fischbarg to apply for sale-of-liquor licenses from the New York State Liquor Authority (“the SLA”). [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 4:21 am
They also wanted Fischbarg to apply for sale-of-liquor licenses from the New York State Liquor Authority (“the SLA”). [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 4:58 am
“Accrual is measured from the commission of the alleged malpractice, when all facts necessary to the cause of action have occurred and the aggrieved party can obtain relief in court, regardless of when the operative facts are discovered by the plaintiff” (Farage v Ehrenberg, 124 AD3d at 164 [citations omitted]; see Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d 164, 166). [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
Redding (08-479), on the constitutionality of strip-searching a student at a public school in search of drugs At 11 a.m. in Eisenstein v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 6:59 am
In Sanchez v. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 4:15 am
Plaintiffs failed to state a cause of action for fraud, as they never alleged that they paid the allegedly fraudulent bills and suffered injury as a result (see Small v Lorillard Tobacco Co., 94 NY2d 43, 57 [1999]). [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 8:45 pm
Eisenstein v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 7:09 am
Eisenstein v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 12:21 pm
Holmes v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 11:11 am
Eisenstein v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 11:29 am
Eisenstein v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 4:26 am
” “Pursuant to CPLR 214(6), an action for legal malpractice must be commenced within three years from the date of accrual (Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d 164, 166 [2001]). [read post]
4 May 2010, 3:59 am
" McCoy v. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 10:59 pm
State, 701 So.2d 76 (Fla. 1997) and Buenoano v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 11:03 am
Eisenstein v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 6:36 pm
However, the bench that heard today’s oral argument in Howell v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 3:11 am
Kupplungbau GmbH v Lerner, 166 AD2d 505, 506-507 [2d Dept 1990]). [read post]
