Search for: "State v. Elias" Results 21 - 40 of 233
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2019, 5:23 am by ASAD KHAN
Elias LJ said that Zambrano had “removed the requirement for even an exiguous cross-border link” before the principle applied. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
On Wednesday, August 17, 2011, the Labor and Employment Law Section of the State Bar of California will present a full-day seminar entitled "Wage & Hour Class Actions After AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 3:15 am by ASAD KHAN
Supreme Court allows tortured Tamil asylum-seeker’s appeal KV (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2019] UKSC 10 (6 March 2019) In a recent judgment given by Lord Wilson the Supreme Court unanimously allowed KV’s appeal, remitting the matter to the UT for fresh determination. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 4:52 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
Elias indicated the Clinton campaign also would file challenges in Michigan and Pennsylvania. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 7:15 am by ASAD KHAN
Elias LJ dissented on the point, but the majority held that the UT had been entitled to reach the conclusion that it did. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 2:17 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
It approved the view of Elias LJ in the Court of Appeal, that very considerable weight should be given to the fact that injuries which are self inflicted by proxy are likely to be extremely rare. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 12:54 pm by CJLF Staff
Supreme Court decision stemming from Hurst v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 3:16 am by ASAD KHAN
Lord Wilson noted that there is evidence of extensive torture by state forces in Sri Lanka at the relevant time. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 12:43 am by ASAD KHAN
The structure of s 117B(6) is straightforward because it unambiguously states that there is no public interest in removal where a person has a genuine and subsisting parental relationship with a qualifying child and it would not be reasonable to expect the child to leave the UK. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 6:15 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals finds the lawsuit plausibly claims Rolling Stone libeled two students whom the article implied had raped a female classmate.The case is Elias v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:59 am by ASAD KHAN
Applying in Bah v UK (2012) 54 EHRR 21 he held that the discrimination was justified on the facts of HC’s case. [read post]