Search for: "State v. Fast Horse" Results 21 - 40 of 67
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
This case was contrasted with the Crazy Horse decision, Alain Bernardin et Cie v Pavilion Properties Ltd [1967] RPC 581, where (as summarised by Lord Neuberger at [38]): In Alain Bernardin, Pennycuick J held that the plaintiffs could not obtain an injunction against the use of the mark CRAZY HORSE in the UK, even though they could establish a reputation here for its cabaret in Paris under that name. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 9:52 am by AskPat
The article contains beautiful illustrations of "natural law" v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 5:55 pm
In this case, the Commonwealth Court concluded, the ruling was based on the Race Horse Industry Reform Act, which only permits off-track betting in facilities that also have high-end restaurants. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 10:12 am by Rosalind English
Against this background, the judge felt that it would be very difficult to draw hard and fast boundaries between ‘zones’ – whether business or familial in nature. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am by Abbott & Kindermann
In this case, the court’s common sense interpretation and application of CEQA Guidelines section 15203 was just good CEQA horse sense. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 10:01 pm by Marie Louise
Not so fast… (TorrentFreak) Canada Fair dealing fine-tuned: Artmob pilots new initiative (IP Osgoode) China Window is closing for pirated software in China: Qingdao Government gives example (IP Dragon) Leading Chinese file-sharing site disables illicit music and movie downloads (TorrentFreak) China domain name scams. [read post]
27 May 2016, 11:31 am by Dave Aitel
While I agree the government must rethink strategic policy choices, Rosenzweig is putting the cart before the horse. [read post]