Search for: "State v. Freund"
Results 21 - 40
of 48
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 1:39 pm
United States in 1967. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 1:01 am
Supreme Court in Muller v. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 12:00 pm
The Court largely endorsed that logic two terms back in Harris v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
In his October 1, 2015 decision in the case of Brands v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 11:52 am
In follow-up to yesterday's post on Judge Williamson's Monroe County Post-Koken decision in Hakim v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 5:04 am
This memo will has obvious added consequences to state interpretation to this issue. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 4:30 pm
In State v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:30 pm
He was joined by Arthur Sutherland, who represented the losing party in Nebbia v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 9:35 am
The influence of the “cert. pool” – in Paul Freund’s view, the “junior Supreme Court” – has also grown. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 5:57 am
As we begin a week of pre-trial sessions in United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 8:57 am
Woodham, 113 F.3d 202 (11th Cir.1997); Freund v. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 3:22 pm
The Comptroller "possesses the authority to resolve conflicting medical evidence and to credit the opinion of one expert over that of another, so long as the credited expert articulates a rational and fact-based opinion premised upon a physical examination and consideration of the relevant medical records" (Matter of Clorofilla v Hevesi, 38 AD3d 1126, 1126 [2007]; see Matter of Freund v Hevesi, 34 AD3d 950, 951 [2006]). [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 4:17 pm
The Comptroller "possesses the authority to resolve conflicting medical evidence and to credit the opinion of one expert over that of another, so long as the credited expert articulates a rational and fact-based opinion premised upon a physical examination and consideration of the relevant medical records" (Matter of Clorofilla v Hevesi, 38 AD3d 1126, 1126 [2007]; see Matter of Freund v Hevesi, 34 AD3d 950, 951 [2006]). [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 2:37 pm
Texas, 539 U.S. 558, 563 (2003), and State v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 8:52 am
In their famous “Brandeis Brief” in Muller v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 1:12 pm
State of Kerala & Anr. 2000(6) SCC 359 and State of Bombay Vs. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 9:49 pm
The Fund was created in October 1918 by the widow of Stephen V. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 9:30 am
(Among Abbott's legal advisers were two allies from Chicago's reform movement, Ernst Freund and--wait for it--Roscoe Pound.) [read post]
