Search for: "State v. GC" Results 21 - 40 of 461
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2018, 6:18 am
Following an appeal to the General Court (GC), this ruled that the Fourth Board of Appeal had acted contrary to the principle of sound administration also by failing to state the reasons of its decision. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 8:00 am by Todd Presnell
→Some are questioning whether SCOTUS nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh would uphold the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 8:00 am by Todd Presnell
→Some are questioning whether SCOTUS nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh would uphold the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 4:00 am
For example, in Freda v Board of Educ. of City of New York, 224 A.D.2d 360, the court ruled that the NYC Police Retirement System could "recoup" over $100,000 of the retirement allowance that had be paid to Freda because the required §211 approval had not been obtained prior to his being reemployed by the New York City Board of Education following his retirement from the New York City Police Department.Such wavers are not required with respect to such reemployments by… [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 3:00 pm
By contrast, both OHIM bodies and GC have a duty to conduct a full review of the national law particulars submitted by parties, obtaining information about the national law of the Member State concerned on their own motion for the purposes of assessing the accuracy of the facts adduced or the probative value of the documents submitted [Edwin v OHIM, Case C‑263/09 P], as the GC did by looking through Italian law and case law on probative value… [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 3:49 am
The Slants (Matal v Tam)According to the GC such criminal activities breach the very values on which the EU is founded, in particular the values of respect for human dignity and freedom as laid down in Article 2 TEUand Articles 2, 3 and 6 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 11:38 am by Eleonora Rosati
Holding otherwise, as the GC does, represents, in the opinion of this author, a (disruptive) escamotage in order to have the Contested Design (and, therefore features of appearance that are solely dictated by their technical function) benefit from the exception set out under Art. 8(3).In other words, in the GC’s construction, the concocted concurrent application of both Arts. 8(1) and 8(2) serves the purpose, in the view of this author, to use Art. 8(2) as a “trojan… [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:06 pm
However, the recent Opinion of Advocate General (AG) Bobek in case C-702/18, Primart Marek Łukasiewicz v. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 2:17 am
In Novartis v EUIPO, T‑678/15 and T‑679/15 the GC had established that a sign which departs significantly from the norm or customs of the sector is capable of being distinctive.The GC disagreed.The sign was not likely to be perceived as representing the letter ‘v’ of the word ‘vericiguat’. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 3:55 pm by Keahn Morris and John Bolesta
Apparent Conflict Between Federal and State Law In seemingly direct conflict with these federal pronouncements are state cases like Dynamex v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 3:38 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
 The Court, by a majority of 5-2, rejected the submissions of the police and Secretary of State, that it should simply declare the current law incompatible with Article 8 ECHR and leave Parliament to amend the law as it saw fit. [read post]