Search for: "State v. Gaffney"
Results 21 - 40
of 54
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2022, 6:00 am
The rule of three was held valid by the Court of Appeals in People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535, a case decided in 1911.In applying the Rule of Three, tie scores allow the appointing authority to make its selection from among far more than three eligible candidates. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
Jubelirer (in 2004) and Gaffney v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:25 am
The rule of three was held valid by the Court of Appeals in People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535, a case decided in 1911. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 8:34 am
Relying upon the Court of Appeals’ decision in Gaffney v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 11:15 am
Court rules that the appointing authority made its appointments consistent with the requirements of Section 61.1 of the Civil Service LawMatter of Cherry v New York State Civ. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 3:10 pm
Clair Gaffney PA, Idaho Falls, Idaho. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 8:00 am
Gaffney, 23 Ill.2d 611 (1962). [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 8:00 am
Gaffney, 23 Ill.2d 611 (1962). [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 9:30 am
Gaffney v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
The rule of three was ruled valid by the Court of Appeals in People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535, a case decided in 1911. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
This decision prompted establishment of the so-called "rule of three," currently set out in Section 61.1 of the Civil Service Law and held valid by the Court of Appeals in People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 12:00 am
This decision prompted establishment of the so-called "rule of three," currently set out in Section 61.1 of the Civil Service Law and held valid by the Court of Appeals in People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
The rule of three was ruled valid by the Court of Appeals in People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535, a case decided in 1911. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 5:36 am
Citing Gaffney v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 4:15 am
"* The rule of three was held lawful by the Court of Appeals in People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535, a case decided in 1911. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:42 pm
These include Gaffney v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 7:56 am
” Gaffney v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 7:56 am
” Gaffney v. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 2:53 am
Case Name: Fox, d/b/a Fibertection Corp. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 4:06 pm
Johnson v Steele, heard 29 October 2014 (Sir David Eady). [read post]
