Search for: "State v. Gallant"
Results 21 - 40
of 50
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2010, 8:02 pm
” [via Findlaw] Gallante Romar Phillips v. [read post]
23 May 2010, 8:41 pm
” [via LexisOne] Gallante Romar Phillips v. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 3:04 am
River Water Conservation Dist. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 6:22 am
Australia has protected its plain packaging law by stating that "... [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 3:48 am
” The memo has become the basis for Republican lawmakers accusing the FBI of developing an anti-Catholic bias in the wake of last year’s Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:23 am
Under the ICC’s founding principle of complementarity, a case is “inadmissible” if it is being “investigated or prosecuted by a State which has jurisdiction over it, unless the State is unwilling or unable genuinely to carry out the investigation or prosecution” (Rome Statute art. 17(1)(a)). [read post]
31 May 2024, 5:55 am
On May 20, the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC) filed applications for arrest warrants in the Situation in the State of Palestine. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 5:20 am
Gallant, Peter J. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 9:02 pm
In the case of United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 8:32 am
Serbia and Croatia v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 3:55 am
Corp. v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 6:59 pm
Scientific Coordination : Jean-Sylvestre Bergé, Stéphanie Francq et Miguel Gardeñes Santiago Administrative Manager : Véronique Gervasoni, Équipe de Droit International, Européen et Comparé (EA n° 4185). [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:02 am
The case is Oracle v UsedSoft, in which Europe's top court is being invited to rule on whether downloaded software may be traded as "used". [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 2:34 pm
Clark and Dixon v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 pm
What a contrast to United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2022, 8:16 am
” Skolnick v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 8:00 am
Protocol I, article 50(3); ICTY Prosecutor v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm
Meanwhile the Jewish Chronicle’s libel lawyer, Simon Gallant, offered some “basic guidelines” on how to tweet without being sued for libel. [read post]
