Search for: "State v. Gay Times, Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 342
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2022, 12:54 am by Frank Cranmer
In Department of Fair Employment and Housing v Cathy’s Creations Inc (CA Super Ct Oct 21, 2022) the court concluded that the Department had failed to prove intentional sexual orientation discrimination. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
  The issue-- the use of free exercise to advance a political judgment of the pastor would indeed have made a more interesting and relevant basis for decision.Next time. . . .and there will be a next time. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 11:33 pm by INFORRM
To depict the contradiction, the article turns to Choudhury v. the United Kingdom, Gay News Ltd. v. the United Kingdom, Otto-Preminger-Institut v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
McClatchy Newspapers, Inc., 936 P.2d 1123, 1127 (Wash. 1997) [6] Id. at 1131, 1133. [7] Redgrave v. [read post]
11 Jun 2022, 12:26 pm by Eugene Volokh
New York Blood Ctr., 213 F.R.D. 108, 111 (E.D.N.Y. 2003); see also North Jersey Media Group Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 3:47 pm by Eugene Volokh
Comm'n (2018) (explaining that state action based on "hostility to a religion or religious viewpoint" violates the state's obligation under the Free Exercise Clause to "proceed in a manner neutral toward" religion); Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 12:40 pm by David Timm
”  For instance, in GAI Consultants, Inc., ENGBCA 6030, 95-2 BCA ¶ 27,620 (Apr. 4, 1995), the board found commercial impracticability where excavation in the winter would have required “commercially unacceptable costs and time input far beyond that contemplated in the contract. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
The New York Times has more information here. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 10:41 am by Eugene Volokh
Irish-American Gay, Lesbian & Bisexual Group of Boston, Inc.] that the State's public accommodation law, as applied to a private parade, "violates the fundamental rule of protection under the First Amendment, that a speaker has the autonomy to choose the content of his own message. [read post]