Search for: "State v. Gotshall" Results 21 - 40 of 124
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2011, 6:30 am by Victoria VanBuren
  [This is the second installment in a three-part series on the Guest-Post:  States’ Rights, Big Business and the Nature of Arbitration:  AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 3:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, 58 AD3d 1, 9-10 [2008]; Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP v Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc., 10 AD3d 267, 271 [2004]. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 8:21 pm
Norman Veasey of Weil, Gotshal & Manges, and Judge Brett Kavanaugh of the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
13 May 2015, 9:11 pm by Kevin LaCroix
” In the following guest post Paul Ferrillo and Jeffrey Osterman of the Weil, Gotshal & Manges law firm and Grady Summers , SVP, Cloud Analytics at Mandiant/FireEye, take a look at the questions businesses and their boards of directors should be asking before adopting a cloud-based strategy. [read post]
19 May 2016, 2:33 pm by Kevin LaCroix
[iii] One driver may be the state of the economy in the United States today. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, 56 AD3d 1, 8 [2008]; Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP v Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc., 10 AD3d 267 [2004]). [read post]
7 May 2015, 7:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In this guest post, Paul Ferrillo and Randi Singer of the Weil, Gotshal & Manges law firm take a look at the latest scams and how they succeed. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 5:49 am
(Last month, the Law Blog posted that Coleman, a noted conservative appellate specialist, left Weil Gotshal for Yetter & Warden, a Houston-based litigation boutique.) [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 4:50 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In the following guest post, Paul Ferrillo and Ronit Berkovich of the Weil, Gotshal & Manges law firm take a look at the key D&O insurance considerations that companies heading into bankruptcy should keep in mind. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 2:42 pm by Dennis Crouch
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and Myriad Genetics (Myriad) (Fed. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 3:33 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Regarding damages, “to survive a … pre-answer dismissal motion, a pleading need only state allegations from which damages attributable to the defendant’s conduct [or nonfeasance] may be reasonably inferred” (Lappin v Greenberg, 34 AD3d 277, 279 [1st Dept 2006] [internal citations omitted]). [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 3:06 pm
United States, which allowed a company to be held criminally liable any time an employee commits a crime intended to help the company. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 10:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
Ferrillo of the Weil Gotshal law firm takes a look at the best approach to the cyber security challenge in the current environment and he also details the critical components of a cyber incident response plan. [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Thus, a plaintiff must meet the “case within a case” requirement to avoid dismissal (see Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP v Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc., 10 AD3d 267, 272 [1st Dept 2004] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]). [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:30 am
Dear Member of Citizens Union or Supporter of Citizens Union Foundation, I am happy to share with you the amicus brief that Citizens Union, along with our partner Common Cause/NY, filed last week in the lawsuit Skelos v. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 4:37 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Supreme Court properly dismissed plaintiff’s legal malpractice cause of action in the original complaint because he failed to allege that “but for” defendant’s negligent conduct, he would have prevailed in the underlying action (Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP v Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc., 10 AD3d 267, 272 [1st Dept 2004]; see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442 [2007]). [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Supreme Court properly dismissed plaintiff’s legal malpractice cause of action in the original complaint because he failed to allege that “but for” defendant’s negligent conduct, he would have prevailed in the underlying action (Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP v Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc., 10 AD3d 267, 272 [1st Dept 2004]; see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442 [2007]). [read post]