Search for: "State v. H. E. H." Results 21 - 40 of 3,290
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2020, 11:01 am by Eric Goldman
This is your reminder that 512(h) subpoenas routinely unmask individuals engaged in lawful activity–without any material court oversight unless the alleged infringer challenges the subpoena. 512(h)’s fast-track to unmasking has not aged well; it’s now a troubling historical anachronism. * Williams v. 3DExport, 2020 WL 532418 (E.D. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 9:44 am
Rambo of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania issued an E-discovery spoliation sanction in the case of Kvitka v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 5:34 pm
The Western Climate Initiative, including California and several  Western States, have proposed a greenhouse gas emission reporting rule that would cover the following industries:   (A) Adipic acid manufacturing (B) Aluminum production (C) Ammonia manufacturing (D) Cement production (E) Coal mine fugitive emissions (active and abandoned) (F) Cogeneration (G) Electricity generation (H) Electronics Manufacturing (I) Ferroalloy production (J) Glass… [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:00 am
E-3 principal nonimmigrant aliens must be coming to the United States solely to perform services in a “specialty occupation”. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 11:00 am by Dan Ernst
ComptonCitizenship, Gender, and Conscience: United States v. [read post]