Search for: "State v. Hague"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,169
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2023, 3:17 am
The latest volume of the Hague Yearbook of International Law (Vol. 34, 2021) is out. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 7:00 am
Because the United States is a signatory of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (“the Hague Convention”), the Mother in Cillikova v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 1:41 am
In Yemgas Fzco & Ors v Superior Pescadores S.A. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 6:54 pm
Central Authority for the Republic of South Africa v B- where delay was used to refuse to return a child to Australia, because he was well settled in South Africa.Central Authority for the Republic of South Africa v Ashmore- where delay was again used to refuse to return a child to Australia. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 5:10 am
Abbott v. [read post]
30 Mar 2019, 3:13 pm
This approach is also mirrored in the Ontario Hague Convention case of Korutowska-Wooff v Wooff, 2004 Canlii 5548 ONCA where the Court stated: [9] I note that the application judge stated that there is also no definition of the term “habitually resident” in the Children’s Law Reform Act. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:13 pm
” Hague Convention, art. 13. [read post]
Recent Hague Convention District Court Cases - Esparza v Nares, 2022 WL 17724414 ( S.D. Texas, 2022)
20 Dec 2022, 7:42 am
England v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 3:41 pm
(yes, the Hague Convention on International Child Abduction, NOT the one about dropping bombs from Zeppelins): Lozano v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 12:35 pm
” Hague Convention, Article 13. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:37 am
Monasky v. [read post]
22 Sep 2012, 7:19 am
In Reyes v Jeffcoat, 2012 WL 4009641 (D.S.C.) [read post]
17 May 2010, 11:45 am
Both the United States and Chile are contracting states to the Hague Convention. [read post]
10 Sep 2022, 7:25 am
[Germany] [Petition granted] [Rights of custody]In Vonnahme v. [read post]
22 Sep 2006, 7:59 am
In this regard, the Court held -- citing cases in Indiana and Texas (Ortman v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
The English translation of Mexico’s older declarations was ambiguous, as we saw in the discussion of Mitchell v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:00 am
The case of the day, Mitchell v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 9:01 pm
In the recent Full Court of the Family Court case of Ustinov v South Australian State Central Authority, the court had to consider in a Hague convention case the issue of "habitual residence". [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:25 pm
Colchester v. [read post]
30 Apr 2006, 8:57 am
In Bader v. [read post]
