Search for: "State v. Hasan"
Results 21 - 40
of 122
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2023, 2:17 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 03/03/23) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter, heard 14th June 2022 R (on the application of VIP… [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 1:57 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 24/02/23) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter, heard 14th June 2022 R (on the application of VIP… [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 1:33 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 16/2/23) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery, heard 7th December 2021 Canada Square… [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 1:45 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 03/02/23) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter, heard 14th June 2022 R (on the application of VIP… [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 3:41 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 26/1/23) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery, heard 7th December 2021 Canada Square… [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 4:35 pm
United States The Supreme Court is also expected to hear two cases – Moody v NetChoice and NetChoice v Paxton – concerning the constitutionality of laws in Florida and Texas, which restrict the content moderation capabilities of social media companies. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 2:01 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 20/01/23) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery, heard 7th December 2021 Canada Square… [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 1:34 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 13/01/23) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery heard 7th December 2021 Canada… [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 4:12 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 19/12/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery heard 7th December 2021 Canada Square… [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 3:45 am
Reference by the Attorney General for Northern Ireland – Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) (Northern Ireland) Bill, heard 19th July 2022 R (on the application of VIP Communications Ltd (In Liquidation)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 4th October 2022 McCue (as guardian for Andrew McCue) (AP) v Glasgow City Council, heard 18th October 2022 Unger and another (in substitution for Hasan) v Ul-Hasan… [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 1:59 am
R (on the application of VIP Communications Ltd (In Liquidation)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 4th October 2022 McCue v Glasgow City Council, heard 18th October 2022 Unger and another (in substitution for Hasan) v Ul-Hasan (deceased) and another, heard 20th October 2022 In the matter of an application by Rosaleen Dalton for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 26th October 2022. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 1:32 am
Reference by the Attorney General for Northern Ireland – Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) (Northern Ireland) Bill, heard 19th July 2022 R (on the application of VIP Communications Ltd (In Liquidation)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 4th October 2022 McCue v Glasgow City Council, heard 18th October 2022 Unger and another (in substitution for Hasan) v Ul-Hasan (deceased) and another, heard… [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 1:35 am
Reference by the Attorney General for Northern Ireland – Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) (Northern Ireland) Bill, heard 19th July 2022 R (on the application of VIP Communications Ltd (In Liquidation)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 4th October 2022 McCue v Glasgow City Council, heard 18th October 2022 Unger and another (in substitution for Hasan) v Ul-Hasan (deceased) and another, heard… [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 1:44 am
Reference by the Attorney General for Northern Ireland – Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) (Northern Ireland) Bill, heard 19th July 2022 R (on the application of VIP Communications Ltd (In Liquidation)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 4th October 2022 McCue v Glasgow City Council, heard 18th October 2022 Unger and another (in substitution for Hasan) v Ul-Hasan (deceased) and another, heard… [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 3:08 am
Reference by the Attorney General for Northern Ireland – Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) (Northern Ireland) Bill, heard 19th July 2022 R (on the application of VIP Communications Ltd (In Liquidation)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 4th October 2022 of DCM (Optical Holdings) v Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 12th October 2022 McCue v Glasgow City Council, heard 18th October… [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 1:55 am
Reference by the Attorney General for Northern Ireland – Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) (Northern Ireland) Bill, heard 19th July 2022 R (on the application of VIP Communications Ltd (In Liquidation)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 4th October 2022 of DCM (Optical Holdings) v Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 12th October 2022 McCue v Glasgow City Council, heard 18th October 2022 Unger and another (in… [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 1:34 am
On Thursday 20th October, the Court will hear Unger and another (in substitution for Hasan) v Ul-Hasan (deceased) and another, on appeal from [2021] EWHC 1791. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Hasan’s able submissions before us, has Mr. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am
Slip Op. 06460 (1st Dept.,2021) the Appellate Division held that Family Court could exercise subject matter jurisdiction in this family offense proceeding notwithstanding that the offenses occurred out of state (see Opportune N. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am
” Here, the court’s determination to deny defendant’s request for attorney’s fees was largely based on its assessment of defendant’s credibility at trial regarding the state of her own finances, her failure to fully account for large sums of money that she had received, and her failure to fully account for assets belonging to plaintiff that she purportedly used for his benefit during the period they were separated. [read post]
