Search for: "State v. Hicks " Results 21 - 40 of 266
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2018, 1:00 pm by Robert Chesney, Steve Vladeck
  Join Professors Steve Vladeck and Bobby Chesney as they wrestle with: A *huge* ruling by Judge Pohl in the Military Commission 9/11 prosecution, barring the government from using at trial statements made by the defendants at GTMO to FBI “clean team” interrogators (in what amounts to a CIPA-style sanction in response to government restrictions on defense access to CIA personnel) The government in the ;Tanvir case (alleging that the plaintiffs… [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 9:23 am
 Neither does the status of the owner (living v. not living). [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 10:07 am
Jan 11, 2007) (available here), resolved an interesting little issue concerning Booker's reach:In this appeal, we consider whether United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 4:41 am
Michael Hicks provided the opposition view, focusing  on the legal test. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:47 am by tracey
Supreme Court The Health and Safety Executive v Wolverhampton City Council [2012] UKSC 34 (18 July 2012) Munir & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 32 (18 July 2012) Alvi, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 33 (18 July 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Horn & Ors v Commercial Acceptances Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 958 (19 July 2012)… [read post]