Search for: "State v. Hoge"
Results 21 - 40
of 50
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2012, 10:11 am
Hoge, 468 A.2d 1380 (Pa. 1983). [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:40 am
In its decision on the case Johannes Gerrit Cornelis van Schaik v Hoge Raad der Nederlanden in Para 21 the Court has ruled that: ...Article 4 of the directive further provides that the roadworthiness tests, within the meaning of the directive, are to be carried out by the State or by bodies or establishments designated and directly supervised by the State. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 2:24 am
The present article analyses the reception of the ECJ cases by courts of the member states. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 11:15 am
The decision (which you can access here) is Case C-119/10 (Frisdranken Industrie Winters BV v Red Bull GmbH). [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 5:07 am
There was only one hope for Realchemie now: an appeal on a point of law to the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Supreme Court of the Netherlands). [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
Conflict of Laws.net had a post on a recent decision of the European Court of Justice, Prism Investments BV v. van der Meer. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 4:20 am
Dunham v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 7:20 am
• Leave a comment on ECJ: Private copying levies II-the Stichting de Thuiskopie v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 4:01 am
Today's the day the Court of Justice of the European Union gave judgment in Case C-462/09 Stichting de Thuiskopie v Opus Supplies Deutschland GmbH, Mijndert van der Lee and Hananja van der Lee, a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (the Dutch Supreme Court). [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 3:53 pm
No. 17 v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 7:40 am
Louis Vuitton v Nadia Plesner). [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 5:03 am
462/09 Stichting de Thuiskopie v Mijndert van der Lee, Hananja van der Lee and Opus Supplies Deutschland GmbH, this being a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (visit the 1709 Blog here for some interesting background material). [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 1:38 am
Celní úrad Tabor) - the English abstract reads as follows: The dogma that claims of the State based on its penal, revenue or other public law are not enforceable abroad – a doctrine also known as the revenue rule – is more and more displaced by European instruments obliging the Member States to collect public law claims of their fellow Member States. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 4:26 am
In Zuid-Chemie v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 11:13 am
This doctrine was confirmed in the cases of Natco Trust v. mr Thesseling q.q., Hoge Raad (Dutch Supreme Court) 20 April 1990, NJ 1991, 560; TAR-Justicia 1 (1991), p. 24-35, and IBC v. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 9:28 am
The Supreme Court of Singapore was the first to refer a question of foreign law to a foreign court (Westacre Investments Inc v The State-Owned Company Yugoimport SDPR (also known as Jugoimport-SDPR) [2009] 2 SLR (R) 166), when it sought a determination of a question of English law. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 8:28 am
The law of a state has to be acknowledged as a cultural achievement. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 3:22 pm
558/08 Portakabin Ltd and Portakabin BV v Primakabin BV, a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands).Portakabin Ltd, who made and sold mobile buildings, owned the Benelux trade mark PORTAKABIN for goods in Classes 6 (metal buildings, parts and building materials) and 19 (non-metal buildings, parts and building materials). [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 9:21 pm
The Court of Justice in its recent judgment of 6 October 2009, ICF v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 9:19 pm
Reference on Art. 1 Brussels I Regulation (C-406/09; Realchemie Nederland BV v. [read post]
