Search for: "State v. Howey" Results 21 - 40 of 136
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2022, 8:00 am by CFM Admin
 The Court concluded that LBRY’s messaging would lead potential investors to understand that the company was pitching speculative value propositions for its digital token that created an expectation of profits under the Howey test. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by CFM Admin
 The Court concluded that LBRY’s messaging would lead potential investors to understand that the company was pitching speculative value propositions for its digital token that created an expectation of profits under the Howey test. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 6:18 am by Unknown
No reasonable trier of fact would reject the SEC's contention that LBC was offered as a security, the court said (SEC v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 8:38 am by Race to the Bottom
Even the Chamber of Digital Commerce notes in its amicus brief for SEC v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm by Gary Gensler
”[3] He further stated, “Congress’ purpose in enacting the securities laws was to regulate investments, in whatever form they are made and by whatever name they are called. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 11:04 am by John Murray
The SEC’s jurisdictional argument is based upon the “Howey test,” as articulated in the 1946 Supreme Court case SEC v. [read post]
The policies further stated that such MNPI should never be disclosed to others who may use that information to make trades. [read post]