Search for: "State v. Jacoby"
Results 21 - 40
of 148
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2020, 6:31 am
State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 8:00 am
The award is among the largest ever issued for a medical malpractice verdict in the state of New York. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 4:03 am
” At the Harvard Law Review Blog (via How Appealing), Aaron Tang suggests that in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 3:55 am
At SCOTUS OA, Tonja Jacobi and Matthew Sag analyze last week’s oral argument in Kahler v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:10 am
At the NCSL blog, Lisa Soronen looks at Monday’s opinion in Herrera v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 4:06 am
United States, ex rel. [read post]
8 May 2019, 3:45 am
Common Cause and Lamone v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 3:42 am
” At SCOTUS OA, Tonja Jacobi and Matthew Sag offer an initial big-picture analysis of all the oral arguments in the current term. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 4:10 am
” At SCOTUS OA, Tonja Jacobi and Matthew Sag predict a 5-4 win for the government. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 3:54 am
In Mitchell v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am
Health Reform Erin Fuse Brown, Georgia State University College of Law, Could States Do Single-Payer? [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 3:27 am
First up is Rucho v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:03 am
United States, ex rel. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 3:55 am
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Jonathan Metzl weighs in on New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 4:12 am
” At SCOTUS OA, Tonja Jacobi and Matthew Sag predict a 6-3 win for the proponents of the Peace Cross in The American Legion v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 4:03 am
First up is United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 4:20 am
” At SCOTUS OA, Tonja Jacobi and Matthew Sag analyze the “clarifying” reargument in Knick v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 8:44 am
Georg Jacoby and Dr. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 6:30 am
At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie looks at New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
