Search for: "State v. James E. Grant" Results 21 - 40 of 916
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” It was taken for granted. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:51 pm by Daphne Keller
Or it could uphold one (probably Texas's), or grant a partial or staged loss in the manners discussed in the previous FAQ. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
  The "Global" Distinction: Legislators are not Officers Article II provides that in the event of a presidential and vice presidential double vacancy "Congress may by Law . . . declar[e] what Officer shall then act as President. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 2:51 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The federal district court granted the insurer’s motion for summary judgment on grounds that Section 533 precluded coverage for the underlying settlement. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am by Joel R. Brandes
Bank National Association v Langner, 168 AD3d 1021 [2d Dept 2019])” The Court observed that CPLR § 2309 sets forth the way oaths and affirmations are to be administered and notes in section (c) regarding oaths and affirmations taken without the state: An oath or affirmation taken without the state shall be treated as if taken within the state if it is accompanied by such certificate or certificates as would be required to entitle a deed acknowledged… [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 6:02 am by Bill Marler
 E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2]respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of… [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 9:41 am by Eugene Volokh
New York attempts to "substitut[e] its own editorial judgment" for that of social media platforms. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am by Norman L. Eisen
Expand all Collapse all Relevant Court Proceedings United States v. [read post]