Search for: "State v. James J. B."
Results 21 - 40
of 884
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2024, 6:00 pm
V. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
As a practical matter, the burden shifts to the party that wishes to challenge the relied upon facts and data to learn more about the cited studies to show that the facts and data are not sufficient under Rule 702(b), and that the testimony is not the product of reliable methods under Rule 702(c). [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm
Origin and Meaning of the Anti-Power-Concentration Principle In Seila Law v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 1:15 pm
Corner Post v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
See James v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 6:50 pm
The Court concluded there were extensive human rights violations and ordered the State to provide specialized medical assistance to the victims, pay compensation for both material losses and pain and suffering, and publicly acknowledge its wrongdoing. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
J. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 2:40 pm
James N. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm
Universal Pictures Corp., 45 F.2d 119, 123 (2d Cir. 1930) (Hand, J.). [2] In re Trasylol Prods. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:55 am
” United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:46 am
See James v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm
Nothing in the post-2013 Act case law suggests that the section 3(3) requirement is any less permissive (see, for example, the first instance decision in Butt v Secretary of State [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB), and particularly Mr Justice Nicol’s comments at [39]. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Did John B. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:35 am
Rosen’s article Katcoff v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 8:59 am
Dustin B. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 6:32 am
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RICHARD J. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 6:32 am
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RICHARD J. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
”[2] In that same policy, the Commission articulated its belief “that a refusal to admit the allegations is equivalent to a denial, unless the defendant or respondent states that he neither admits nor denies the allegations. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am
John B. [read post]
