Search for: "State v. Jeremy J. S." Results 21 - 40 of 340
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
The decision is about likelihood of confusion, reputed trade marks' extended protection, and passing off.* The Naked Truth: use of BARELY THERE wasn't even barely thereAnother Irish Patents Office’s decision that Jeremy reports is HBI Branded Apparel Enterprises LLC v Dunnes Stores Ireland Company. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 9:20 am by Steve Hall
  More on the Supreme Court's 2008 ruling in Baze v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 9:30 pm by ernst
Fletcher; The Doctrine of Christian Discovery: Its Fundamental Importance in United States Indian Law and the Need for its Repudiation and Removal, by Joseph J. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 12:49 pm by Howard Friedman
Varuhas, Damages and Human Rights: Introduction, (Chapter 1 of JNE Varuhas, Damages and Human Rights (Hart Publishing, 2016)).Jeremy Waldron, What a Dissenting Opinion Should Have Said in Obergefell v. [read post]
11 Jun 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On 8 June 2017 there was an application in the case of Alsaifi v Amunwa before Warby J. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
The operation’s costs amount to £75,000, and Andrew J. [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:40 am
 On the principle of the matter, he stated at 111:In my judgment this reasoning [from Rohm & Haas] is persuasive, and it is supported by the subsequent judgment of the Court of Appeal in Virgin v Premium. [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm by INFORRM
It was Jeremy Hunt’s former special adviser Adam Smith and News Corporation lobbyist Frédéric Michel, however, who dominated the news coverage. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 2:37 pm
The CJEU’s ruling in DHL v ChronopostThe CJEU made it manifestly clear in its 2011 ruling in Case C-235/09 DHL v Chronopost [see previous Katpost here] that a Europe-wide injunction should only be granted in order to ensure that the proprietor can protect his trade mark, prohibiting only uses which affect or are liable to affect the functions of the trade mark. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Kruse, Jeremi Suri, and James M. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 3:28 am by Amy Howe
In the ABA Journal, Mark Walsh previews next month’s oral arguments in the cellphone privacy cases, United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
  Nicklin J ruled that the meaning of Murray’s tweet was that Riley “had publicly stated in a tweet that he [Mr Corbyn] deserved to be violently attacked”. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 1:00 pm
In the present case it is yet to be decided, but last Friday Arnold J's view was that "it should be two years. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
 Jeremy offers an introduction …* Round, round: how to round? [read post]