Search for: "State v. K. B. G."
Results 21 - 40
of 743
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2023, 10:12 am
The distinction between the tariff and a licence, if any; g. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 4:29 pm
The Court in Gürbüz and Bayar v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 1:23 am
In a situation where a PCT application is jointly filed by parties A and B, (i) designating party A for one or more designated States and party B for one or more other designated States, and (ii) claiming priority from an earlier patent application designating party A as the applicant, the joint filing implies an agreement between parties A and B allowing party B to rely on the priority, unless there are substantial factual indications to… [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 3:26 pm
Cindy K. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 4:57 pm
Correction Law 168-k(1) requires registration for sex offenders who move to New York State and whose prior convictions require registration under 168-a(2)(d) (elements test or requiring registration in the other jurisdiction or listed Federal crimes) or 168-A(3)(b) (essential elements of sexually violent offenses). [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 10:14 am
Trefonas.Representing Appellee: Peter K. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 8:00 am
A Tаx levy, under Unіtеd States Fеdеrаl law, іѕ аn аdmіnіѕtrаtіvе асtіоn by thе Internal Revenue Service (IRS) under ѕtаtutоrу аuthоrіtу, gеnеrаllу wіthоut gоіng tо соurt, to ѕеіzе… [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm
A method of analyzing a DNA sample that contains genetic material from at least two individuals to determine a probability distribution of genotype likelihood or weight in the sample, comprising the steps: (a) amplifying the DNA sample to produce an amplification product comprising DNA fragments, wherein each allele at a locus is amplified to generate relative amounts of DNA fragments of the alleles that are proportional to the relative amounts of template DNA from the alleles in the DNA sample, and… [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 4:12 pm
Students C, D, E, F, and G may also now be involved in targeting Student V. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 11:01 am
On the other hand, “a disclaimer should not remove more than is necessary […] to restore novelty […]” (see G 1/03 [headnote 2.2] and [3]).[5.5.1] The second paragraph of G 1/03 [3] states“However, the only justification for the disclaimer is to exclude a novelty-destroying disclosure […]. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 8:54 am
ASKIN v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 1:25 pm
(g) Patents, trade-marks, utility models and designs shall be deemed to be situated at the place where the trade, business or profession to which it pertains is carried on. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 4:27 am
§ 1396r-8(g)(1)(B)(I). [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 12:08 pm
Jošt, G. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 12:46 pm
Thomas G. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 8:00 am
In оthеr wоrdѕ, federal and state gоvеrnmеntѕ may рlасе tаx liens fоr unраіd іnсоmе tаxеѕ, whіlе lосаl gоvеrnmеntѕ mау рlасе tаx lіеnѕ fоr unраіd lосаl income… [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:14 am
JOHN a/k/a TRINITY POPE v. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
After West Virginia v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 8:27 am
(d/b/a CHEAPTICKETS.COM) v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 8:26 am
NICHOLS, f/k/a NANCY B. [read post]
