Search for: "State v. Langley"
Results 21 - 40
of 79
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2007, 1:57 am
The final sentence of 35 USC 103(a), entirely unaffected by KSR v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 7:58 am
State of Georgia (1972). [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 7:21 am
State of Georgia (1972). [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 11:29 am
State of Georgia (1972). [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 10:56 am
State of Georgia (1972). [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 9:31 am
State of Georgia (1972). [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 11:04 am
State of Georgia (1972). [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 6:59 am
Ashley Langley v (1) Preston Crown Court (2) West Lancashire DC (3) The Secretary of State for Justice [2008] EWHC 2623 (Admin) concerns the routes of appeal from an order varying an ASBO. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 10:21 am
Such was the case in Langley v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 5:53 am
In Good Samaritan Medical Center v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 7:59 am
Supreme Court 2007 ruling in Panetti v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 6:03 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
22 Sep 2007, 8:09 am
For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court. 07a0379p.06 Langley v. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 1:34 am
Significantly, there is no right of appeal to the Crown Court against a decision of the magistrates' to vary (or not to vary) an ASBO; one must either seek judicial review or appeal by way of case stated - Langley v Preston Crown Court [2008] EWHC 2623 (Admin). [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 1:34 am
Significantly, there is no right of appeal to the Crown Court against a decision of the magistrates' to vary (or not to vary) an ASBO; one must either seek judicial review or appeal by way of case stated - Langley v Preston Crown Court [2008] EWHC 2623 (Admin). [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:24 pm
State District Judge J.D. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 7:05 am
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Order in Druery v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 8:09 am
Judge Langley found every witness called by the State to be credible, and every witness called by Mr. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 2:40 pm
In Chan v. [read post]
