Search for: "State v. Lindgren" Results 21 - 38 of 38
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2023, 9:30 am by Jim Lindgren
Supreme Court will consider these wrenching facts of Gonzales v. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 1:42 pm
Remember when she couldn't name a single Supreme Court case other than Roe v Wade? [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 2:35 pm
The court excluded a number of other items that the State sought to introduce.People v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 4:48 pm
(This follows the flurry of activity a couple of weeks ago on the meaning of "natural born citizen" -- see Jim Lindgren, Solum, Jack Balkin, and Solum). [read post]
8 May 2023, 5:00 am by Chloe Reichel
In one recent federal district court opinion, Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Had one looked at this issue in 1921, the United States would have had company: At that time, Australia and Canada, countries that, like the United States, were influenced by the British tradition, provided judges with indefinite tenure during good behavior.[3]However, each of these countries amended their constitutions and adopted mandatory retirement ages for their federal judges later in the 20thcentury – 70 in Australia, 75 in Canada. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
(Our own Jim Lindgren has written oft-cited articles on it, and blogged on it as well.) [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 9:14 pm by Steven Calabresi
The size of the Supreme Court did increase from 6 justices at the founding, to 7 and then 9, before 1861, as the population and number of states in the union increased exponentially. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 10:01 am
Más o menos, por acá vienen los tiros: Monroe Freeman, The Unconstitutionality of Elected State Judges. [read post]