Search for: "State v. M. K." Results 21 - 40 of 2,084
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
  If only some, then there’s the additional question of how much effort the legal system should expend, or force the parties to expend, in sorting one from the other.We thought we’d explore that question today, and we start by comparing arguably the most pro-plaintiff state in the country – Idaho – on comment k issues with the most pro-defense state – California. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 10:47 am
And also that this one-word wonder is not a/k/a "People of the State of California". [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 7:22 am
Contents include:Sangeeta Shah & Sandesh Sivakumaran, The Use of International Human Rights Law in the Universal Periodic Review Rebecca K Helm & Hitoshi Nasu, Regulatory Responses to ‘Fake News’ and Freedom of Expression: Normative and Empirical Evaluation Lene Guercke, State Responsibility for a Failure to Prevent Violations of the Right to Life by Organised Criminal Groups: Disappearances in Mexico Johan Rochel, Connecting the Dots: Digital Integrity as a… [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 6:49 pm by Jon L. Gelman
The Court next considers whether the federal CSA extinguishes M&K’s obligations under state law. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 1:41 pm by Meg Martin
Kerin, Appellate Counsel; Eric M. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 9:12 pm
In this case, the plaintiff, M&K Chemical Engineering Consultants, Inc., an engineering firm from Illinois bid a project to perform design work to replace a cooling system for a chemical reactor in St. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 12:28 pm by WSLL
Reversed.Case Name: CONNIE MARIE POWELL v. [read post]