Search for: "State v. Magazine" Results 21 - 40 of 3,409
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
" The platforms challenged the law on First Amendment grounds in NetChoice v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:35 am by centerforartlaw
”[11] In 1813, the American vessel, Marquis de Somerueles, was carrying cargo from the Italian Academy of Arts when it was captured by the British.[12] The United States successfully petitioned the Admiralty Court of Halifax to have the cargo be returned to the United States.[13] The Court held that the arts and sciences are entitled to protection as “an exception to the severe rights of warfare. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 12:05 am by Josh Richman
She joined The Times in 2019 after having worked at Gizmodo Media Group, Fusion, Forbes Magazine and Above the Law. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 11:26 am
California Chief Justice Delivers 2024 State of the Judiciary Address -- The transcript of her remarks as delivered is at the link above (you can also Watch).Law360 has What To Watch As Justices Consider Appeal Deadline Case -- In Harrow v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 1:41 pm by David Kopel
A few days after the Supreme Court decided New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
Professor Kate Sang has received £15,000 after the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, Michelle Donelan, wrongly accused her of supporting Hamas. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:13 am
An intriguing headline at Snopes.The since-rescinded memo, sent from the VA Office of the Assistant Under Secretary of Health for Operations, stated that photo should be removed on the grounds that it depicted a non-consensual kiss: "This memorandum requests the removal of the 'V-J Day in Times Square' photograph from all Veterans Health Administration facilities in alignment with the Department of Veterans Affairs' commitment to maintaining a safe,… [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
  Those have been traditionally considered to be almost unavailable (under the rule in Bonnard v Perryman) but there are judicial stirrings that this may be old law. [read post]