Search for: "State v. Mark A. Miller"
Results 21 - 40
of 781
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2014, 2:06 pm
Property Damage Appraisers Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 12:44 pm
One strand of this afternoon's programme at the Fordham IP Conference was dedicated to trade marks -- starting with premium products and the brands with which they are associated.Speaking first, Monika Tomczak-Górlikowska (Miller Canfield, Warsaw) contrasted bricks & mortar shopping with internet commerce within the context of vertical sales restraints in the European Union. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 6:55 am
In Smedley v Smedley, 2014 WL 11996390 (E.D. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 6:50 am
In Smedley v Smedley, 2014 WL 11996390 (E.D. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 8:05 am
Yesterday, the Federal Circuit heard oral arguments in FLFMC, LLC v. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 11:32 pm
Katfriend Guido Noto La Diega (Northumbria University) looks into issues of registration for olfactory marks at the EU and UK levels.Here’s what Guido writes:“In the UK, whereas in theory olfactory trade marks can be registered, there have not been successful applications since the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Ralf Sieckmann v Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 4:15 am
In State of Wisconsin v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
United States, and United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 11:39 am
In Toyukak v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 12:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 12:44 pm
Court Rejects Iowa Murderer's Appeal: An Iowa appeals court has denied a life-sentenced murderer's claim that his re sentencing to comply with the Supreme Court's 2012 ruling in Miller v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 9:53 am
A few years after deciding Pennsylvania Coal, the Supreme Court returned to regulatory takings with Miller v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 6:36 am
Defense Attorney: Mark D. [read post]
13 May 2015, 6:30 am
Recent United States Supreme Court decisions, such as Shelley v. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 5:14 am
Mark Foster (`Individual A’ in Count Two) and Michael Lipson (`Individual B’ in Count Three) by including their names in the Fellowship resolution which falsely stated they were present at a meeting of all Fellowship members in which they voted to allow Miller, as Fellowship's managing member, to pledge Fellowship property for the DEMCO loan. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:17 am
By the Kean Miller State and Local Tax Team On June 21, 2018, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its opinion in South Dakota v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 6:20 am
Miller’s Ale House, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 11:08 am
The thumb drive did not have Miller's name or marks identifying the drive as Miller’s. . . . [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 6:30 am
For the Balkinization Symposium on Mark A. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 2:46 am
Case Name: Jenkins v. [read post]