Search for: "State v. Mark T."
Results 21 - 40
of 11,198
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2010, 6:38 am
Ruggers, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 8:02 am
Luen Fat Metal and Plastic Manufactory Limited v Jacobs & Turner Limited t/a Trespass [2019] EWHC 118.BackgroundThe Claimant owns:a series of 3 UK word marks: FUNTIME, FUN TIME, and FUN-TIME in respect of “Class 28: Games, toys and playthings; electronic games”.an EU trade mark for the word FUNTIME for the same goods in class 28. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 5:40 pm
Wade Is Under Immediate Threat; If the Supreme Court doesn’t stay a Louisiana law next week, states will have a clear path to nullify the constitutional right to choose”: Mark Joseph Stern has this jurisprudence essay online at Slate. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 10:54 am
See State v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 2:52 am
’ United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 8:32 am
So was Bush v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 8:02 am
This essay explores the possible dual readings of AT&T v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 8:08 pm
” Nonetheless, the Court stated that “[t]his, however, is what the clear language allows. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 12:05 pm
In this month that marks the centenary of World War I, the U.S. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 11:12 am
The less-known case (United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 12:16 am
A cautionary example of such a situation is the recent General Court judgment in Lidl Stiftung v EUIPO - MHCS (Nuance de la couleur orange) (T-652/22) concerning the orange colour trade mark for the Veuve Clicquot champagne. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 9:24 am
Applying for the right kind of mark is crucial for successfully defending the trade mark, as the recent General Court judgment in DPG Deutsche Pfandsystem v EUIPO - Užstato sistemos administratorius (case T-774/21) shows. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
State v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 2:04 pm
North American Olive Oil Ass’n v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 3:14 pm
In truth, though, for slogan marks the public’s perception is not the same as for other types of marks and, therefore, assessing their distinctiveness results more difficult.In the light of Audi v OHIM the General Court addressed some typical issues affecting slogan marks. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 2:54 am
In our case, the plaintiffs’ mark, as stated in the registration, is “[t] he color(s) light blue is/are claimed as a feature of the mark. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 3:52 pm
You won't catch the Advocate General dressed like this in court ... [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 6:50 am
Brigadier General Mark Martins’s statement regarding this week’s hearings in United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 5:17 am
Belmora LLC v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 2:26 am
Indeed, in paragraph 55, the Court states that “the coexistence of earlier marks on the market might reduce the likelihood of confusion. [read post]
