Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 21 - 40
of 21,402
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Menora Mivtachim Insurance Ltd. v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:57 am
Guarascio v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:00 am
Justifying Hamas's murderous pogrom by saying Israel deserved what it got is nothing less than supporting a terrorist organization – the same as blaming the United States for 9/11. [read post]
20 May 2024, 4:38 am
See Sheetz of Del., Inc. v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 4:00 am
/Idaho v. [read post]
18 May 2024, 2:48 pm
The basis for this decision is explained in Cyber Power Systems (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 9:05 pm
In each of the last two U.S. congressional sessions, Senator Mark R. [read post]
17 May 2024, 2:18 pm
Dairy Export Council et al. v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 1:16 pm
Carlisle v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 12:37 pm
Brown v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am
Union Jack and European Union flag 2012 © Dave Kellam (CC BY-SA 2.0 Deed) Today marks a significant step towards the reconstruction of EU-UK Judicial Cooperation. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:04 am
" Chestek PLLC v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:11 pm
Broderick on August 28.[42] Most recently, in an order filed by United States Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on February 12, 2024, the Court addressed a pending privilege dispute over which state’s law should apply to resolve the documents.[43] Another issue was whether the attorney-client privilege between the Estate and its counsel exten [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:00 am
" Viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff as the nonmovant (see Vega v Restani Constr. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:00 am
" Viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff as the nonmovant (see Vega v Restani Constr. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:32 am
In March, our team at Georgetown Law’s Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection—along with our co-counsel at Law Forward and Stafford Rosenbaum, LLP—settled Penebaker v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
"Legislative enactments enjoy a strong presumption of constitutionality and parties challenging a duly enacted statute face the initial burden of demonstrating the statute's invalidity beyond a reasonable doubt" (Delgado v State of New York, 194 AD3d 98, 103 [3d Dept 2021] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted], affd 39 NY3d 242 [2022]; see Center for Jud. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
"Legislative enactments enjoy a strong presumption of constitutionality and parties challenging a duly enacted statute face the initial burden of demonstrating the statute's invalidity beyond a reasonable doubt" (Delgado v State of New York, 194 AD3d 98, 103 [3d Dept 2021] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted], affd 39 NY3d 242 [2022]; see Center for Jud. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]