Search for: "State v. McDonnell "
Results 21 - 40
of 632
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2019, 6:40 am
She can do so in a variety of ways, one of which is by navigating the familiar burden-shifting framework established by the Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:52 am
Early this month, in Coleman v. [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 9:10 am
In McDonnell v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 1:00 pm
The US Supreme Court [official website] heard oral arguments [day call, PDF] Wednesday in McDonnell v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 2:00 pm
Bouldin McDonnell v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:18 am
Supreme Court oral argument in McDonnell v. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 8:24 am
This skirmish remains in progress, but the latest battle, the Second Circuit opinion in AFSCME v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 11:05 am
The US Supreme Court [official website] on Monday ruled [opinion, PDF] unanimously in McDonnell v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 1:00 pm
Kenneth McDonnell (EBRI) has just posted on SSRN an interesting study comparing the compensation of public-sector and private-sector employees. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 9:48 am
The decision, Gossett v. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 4:33 pm
Here is the abstract: In a unanimous opinion in McDonnell v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 9:37 am
Of course the Bridgegate (Kelly v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm
In McDonnell v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 8:48 am
In 1973, the United States Supreme Court issued a landmark employment discrimination case, McDonnell Douglas v. [read post]
8 May 2018, 8:48 am
In 1973, the United States Supreme Court issued a landmark employment discrimination case, McDonnell Douglas v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 10:22 am
Clemons v. [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 7:02 pm
Issue summaries are from ScotusBlog, which also links to papers: McDonnell v. [read post]
25 Jun 2016, 6:00 am
United States, Voisine v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 7:22 am
Citing Gann v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 9:38 am
The Supreme Court pointed to the routine actions that officeholders undertake for constituents in finding that the facts of McDonnell v. [read post]
