Search for: "State v. Michael Hale" Results 21 - 40 of 88
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2019, 12:55 pm by Gordon Ahl, William Ford
The committee will hear testimony from David Hale, the undersecretary of state for political affairs. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Supreme Court evaluated sobriety checkpoints (at which everyone must stop and submit to observation and answer some questions) under the Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable seizures, Justice Stevens, in Michigan Dept. of State Police v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am by CMS
Notes that the Public Law Project will not be making oral submissions, but says these are important submissions. 1200: Michael Fordham QC says the closest case we have is Bobb & Anor v Manning (Trinidad & Tobago) [2006] UKPC 22 (25 April 2006). 11:55:  Michael Fordham QC submits it is accepted prerogative power has to be exercised in the public interest. 11:48: Michael Fordham QC queries whether there is some magic for prerogative… [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
Katfriend Nicoletta Epaminonda takes a loot at the Cypriot transposition of the Trade Mark Directive 2015/2436 and reflects on what the future might hold for trade marks in this Member State. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 2:26 pm by Lev Sugarman
Anderson, a Q&A moderated by Brookings Senior Fellow Frank Rose, and a panel discussion led by Michael O’Hanlon of the Brookings Foreign Policy Program. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 1:59 am by CMS
This is outwith the competence of the Scottish Parliament. 1453: The Advocate General states that the Scottish Parliament cannot proceed on basis that it will amend its legislation in future if it needs to. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 3:00 am by William Ford
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 12:08 pm by Eric Goldman
Authored by Mark Flanagan, Patrick Carome and Ari Holtzblatt of Wilmer Hale. * GitHub Letter. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 4:01 am by Amy Howe
Hyatt, in which the Court is considering whether a state agency can be haled into another state’s courts against its will, comes from Lyle Denniston for this blog, with commentary from Jessica Berch and Chad DeVeaux at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]