Search for: "State v. Milano" Results 21 - 40 of 73
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2017, 1:08 pm by Ilya Somin
In a concurring opinion joined by one other judge, Judge Barbara Milano Keenan argues that the president also lacked statutory authorization for his order, in addition to violating the Constitution. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 12:25 pm by Eric Goldman
Perfect 10 ruling, the court cleans out all of the state law claims (unfair competition, state trademark infringement, tortious interference, negligence and unjust enrichment) due to Section 230. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 1:23 am by Dominic Adair
Any doubt on this issue is resolved by the CJEU decision in Solvay v Honeywell which provides a clear analogy. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 1:03 am by Vanessa Rieu
Dr Adair noted that the idea for granting such declarations dates back to the Arrow Generics v Merck case, concerning alendronate, about 10 years ago. [read post]
R (Lumsdon & Ors) v Legal Services Board [2015] UKSC 41, 24 June 2015 (see judgment). [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 8:10 am
 Some features that remain in the Rules are:Only "Universities and other non-profit educational bodies of higher or professional education established in a Member State of the European Union", and not commercial providers, will be able to offer the course (Rule 6).The minimum duration of the Course remains at 120 hours of lectures and practical training (Rule 4).Examination must include both a written and oral examination (Rule 4).Also unchanged is that a European patent… [read post]