Search for: "State v. Miller Home Development, Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 126
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
  In a hopeful development, after Conte was decided, the California Supreme Court, in an asbestos case, rejected the sort of foreseeability uber alles rationale on which Contewas based:An interpretation of [the law] that would require a manufacturer to war [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 8:40 am by MBettman
Case Background In 1998, Lucas County, Ohio, issued municipal bonds in support of a nursing home development, to be run by Foundation for the Elderly, Inc. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 7:07 am by Joy Waltemath
Sec. 27-14-102(a)(xxiii) was supported by substantial evidence (Circle C Resources, Inc v Kobielusz, March 11, 2014, Burke, J). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Plaintiff and Miller gave different accounts of what happened next, but it is undisputed that Miller shot plaintiff, who was unarmed, in the stomach and that plaintiff suffered serious injuries. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Plaintiff and Miller gave different accounts of what happened next, but it is undisputed that Miller shot plaintiff, who was unarmed, in the stomach and that plaintiff suffered serious injuries. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 2:00 pm by John Elwood
BP Exploration & Production Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 9:08 am by MBettman
The mortgage contained a provision stating that foreclosure on such a loan is not authorized unless also authorized by Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) mandatory regulations governing FHA loans. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Byndloss) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15-16 February 2017. [read post]