Search for: "State v. Mullis"
Results 21 - 29
of 29
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2010, 5:50 pm
Responses to the Proposal In the report by Professor Mullis and Dr Scott “Something Rotten in the State of English Libel Law? [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 1:13 am
Reputation, as Lord Nicholls explained in Reynolds v Times Newspapers, does matter, and not merely for its service to the individual concerned: ‘Reputation is an integral and important part of the dignity of the individual. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:13 am
On the contrary as Professor Mullis and others have pointed out, all the major changes in recent years have been in favour of the media: the development of Reynolds privilege from 1999 and its strengthening recently in Jameel; the introduction of the offer of amends procedure, and the ability of the Court of Appeal to control the award of damages by juries. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 2:15 am
Responses to the Proposal In the report by Professor Mullis and Dr Scott “Something Rotten in the State of English Libel Law? [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 5:19 pm
Responses to the Proposal In the report by Professor Mullis and Dr Scott “Something Rotten in the State of English Libel Law? [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 9:52 pm
The bill reads as follows: 09 Senate Resolution 632 By: Senators Pearson of the 51st, Rogers of the 21st, Williams of the 19th, Wiles of the 37th, Mullis of the 53rd and others ADOPTED SENATE A RESOLUTION Affirming states' rights based on Jeffersonian principles; and for other purposes. - Notice that little "and for other purposes? [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 6:04 pm
Mullis v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 12:18 pm
In an illustration of legislative sausage making at its finest, the legislature passed and yesterday the Governor signed into law, a bill that gives the insurance industry and the trial lawyers pieces of what they wanted this year, over the opposition of the State Insurance Commissioner. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 10:19 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Toby Mullis v. [read post]
