Search for: "State v. Murphy"
Results 21 - 40
of 2,090
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2007, 6:46 pm
Nine specs were dismissed prior to the scheduled date of Colonel Murphy's Article 32 hearing (which Colonel Murphy subsequently waived).Interestingly, the Times article states that the larceny specs are unrelated to the licensure issues that formed the original core of the charges. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 7:53 am
The Texas Supreme Court denied the landowners’ motion for rehearing last Friday in Murphy v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 8:49 am
In Murphy, Alito says that “Congress cannot issue direct orders to state legislatures. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 11:10 am
In Falbo v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 8:59 am
Erin Murphy (pictured) and Peter P. [read post]
16 May 2018, 4:11 pm
Justice Alito’s opinion in Murphy v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 6:38 am
Here are relevant materials in United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 6:00 am
Murphy Oil USA, No. 16-307 (5th Cir., October 26, 2015), Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 12:09 pm
It's Murphy v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 12:47 pm
Murphy of the U.S. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:22 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently dismissed the appeal in Comer v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 6:35 am
Too bogus to fool the IRS, but real enough for conviction -- Murphy’s law is alive and well.United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 3:39 am
Circuit's stunning decision in Murphy v. [read post]
30 Oct 2006, 3:00 am
Circuit weighs whether to grant the Government's petition for rehearing en banc in Murphy v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 4:30 am
Murphy v. [read post]
10 Nov 2006, 2:00 am
The Supreme Court has received its first petition based on Murphy v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 4:35 pm
Murphy said he thought Ambassador Tai was “too nice” to be a good negotiator for the United States. [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 3:10 am
Blogosphere commentary on yesterday's bombshell tax decision in Murphy v. [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 1:02 pm
I have assembled commentary from the following Tax Profs on yesterday's bombshell tax decision in Murphy v. [read post]
