Search for: "State v. N. Anderson" Results 21 - 40 of 504
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Seven: Trump’s Two Remaining “Off-Ramp” Arguments: (i) That Colorado has Implemented a De Facto Extraconstitutional Presidential Qualification, in Violation of Term Limits v. Thornton; and (ii) That Colorado has Abused its Article II Authority to Appoint Presidential Electors in a “Manner” of Appointment that Colorado Law Doesn’t Authorize
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm by Marty Lederman
Senator); Anderson v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
:@WilliamBaude: Section Three Is Not A "Political Question"
7 Feb 2024, 5:19 am by Will Baude
"  (Ms. at 30, n. 95.) [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Six: The Two “Off-Ramp” Arguments Based Upon In re Griffin’s Case that Would Allow the Supreme Court to Avoid Deciding Whether Trump is Eligible to be President
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
  The state courts, for example, are not trying to enjoin Donald Trump from taking office. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
[Josh Blackman] In Trump v. Anderson, the Respondents' Theory Would Render Unconstitutional Every Speaker and President Pro Tempore Since 1789, as Well as President Grant's VP and Presidential Candidate George McGovern
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Fund v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Four: Trump’s Argument That His Tenure as President Did Not Subject Him to Section 3 Because the President is Not an “Officer of the United States”
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  And strangely, Part II-A of Professor Tillman’s brief devotes six pages to arguing (mistakenly) that “[i]n the Constitution of 1788, the President did not hold an ‘Office … under the United States,'” without arguing that the same is true in Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment—let alone that the alleged limited meaning of that phrase in 1788 is a reason for reversing the Colorado Supreme Court.) [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Interim Post: Two Important Things All the Parties Get Wrong, and One Other Important Thing They Don’t Address
2 Feb 2024, 7:27 am by Marty Lederman
M'Clung v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
[Kurt Lash] Section Three and the "First Insurrection" … That Wasn't
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am by Kurt Lash
Anderson, and I'm delighted to have it published here. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part One: Why the U.S. Supreme Court Might Resolve the Case Even Though Its Decision Probably Won’t Affect the Colorado Presidential Primary Election Ballot
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm by Marty Lederman
 Trump v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
[Josh Blackman] Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar Retreat From Their "Global" Rule for the "Offices" and "Officers" of the Constitution
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
Anderson, the Section 3 case. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Guest Post: 2023 Survey of Significant Decisions Involving California Section 533
25 Jan 2024, 2:51 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In County of Sacramento v. [read post]
The D & O Diary - http://www.dandodiary.com/
[Eugene Volokh] Amicus Brief Related to the Mackey "Vote-by-Text" Meme Prosecution
16 Jan 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
United States v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Eugene Volokh] Court Rejects Fan's Libel Claims Against L.A. Clippers Player Russell Westbrook and the Utah Jazz
29 Dec 2023, 2:52 pm by Eugene Volokh
From Keisel v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
The 5 Worst Copyright Lawsuits of 2023
24 Dec 2023, 3:26 pm by Aaron Moss
The court relied on Anderson v. [read post]
Copyright Lately - https://copyrightlately.com/
Recent Decisions and Legislation, December 13, 2023
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am by Joel R. Brandes
  In Anderson v Anderson, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2023 WL 8246131, 2023 N.Y. [read post]
New York Divorce and Family Law Blog - http://brandeslaw.blogspot.com/
Risk News — Lawyer-as-Witness DQ Move, HIPAA Client Confidentiality v. Law Firm PR Update
12 Dec 2023, 6:42 am by brbadmin
See Craig v. [read post]
Bressler Risk Blog - http://www.bresslerriskblog.com
[Josh Blackman] Jefferson Davis: President of the United States?
8 Dec 2023, 7:54 am by Josh Blackman
Anderson. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Eugene Volokh] #TheyLied Case Filed by Elected Official Over Allegations of Sexual Assault Can Go Forward
4 Dec 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
From Anderson v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Supreme Court on Patent Law: November 2023
29 Nov 2023, 8:41 am by Dennis Crouch
Ct. 1367, 1374 (2020), which stated in passing that “the § 315(b)-barred party can join a[n existing IPR] proceeding initiated by another petitioner. [read post]
Patently-O - https://patentlyo.com
Collegium Ramazzini & Its Fellows – The Lobby
19 Nov 2023, 11:28 am by admin
Anderson Barry I. [read post]
Tortini - http://schachtmanlaw.com/blog/
Colorado Judge Rejects 14th Amendment Disqualification Effort to Bar Trump from Ballot
18 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
Here is the opinion: Anderson v. [read post]
Jonathan Turley - https://jonathanturley.org/