Search for: "State v. Pohle"
Results 21 - 40
of 126
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2014, 4:46 pm
CDR Mizer says that the letters are destined for the French government in connection with the M/V Limburg. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 11:00 am
Last week, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 11:48 am
Nevin, the SJA explained that KSM’s stated reason for not attending was that the guard force had not told him that there was a hearing scheduled for Sunday. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 11:09 am
Fresh from the Guantanamo security scrub: an amended docketing order for the upcoming hearing, late this month, in United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 1:54 pm
Under Crawford v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 3:14 pm
This prevents Bormann from discussing the records with her client, which goes against “one of the most fundamental aspects” of Skipper v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 10:22 am
Judge Pohl calls the session to order. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 10:00 am
Citing U.S. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 10:30 am
Judge James Pohl has tweaked the calendar in United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 7:18 pm
Military Commissions Chief Prosecutor Mark Martins released a statement following the completion of yesterday’s hearing in United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 12:33 pm
To support this position, Ryan cites an Eighth Circuit case, United States v Barrow, in which the court required a “deficiency in appointed counsel’s representation,” rather than simple “unwillingness … to communicate with counsel,” as well as the arguably similar cases of Stenson v Lambert and Hunter v Delo. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 9:14 am
Fresh from a security scrub are these two items in United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 11:03 am
And, the prosecutor continues, Al-Nashiri’s is just as robustly staffed as the defense was in United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 2:15 pm
General Martins begins by calling Judge Pohl’s attention to the ‘ten-category framework’ from his 2014 discovery order in United States v. al Nashiri. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 11:04 am
Judge Pohl takes this as a convenient time for a recess. [read post]
23 May 2017, 12:40 pm
Judge Pohl made note of Mr. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 6:34 pm
Judge Pohl interjects to state the obvious and uneasy conclusion of this argument is that a pro se defendant must have access to classified information. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 10:28 am
Citing a DC Circuit case United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 7:44 am
For the first time since February, proceedings in military commissions case United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 1:00 pm
Join Professors Steve Vladeck and Bobby Chesney as they wrestle with: A *huge* ruling by Judge Pohl in the Military Commission 9/11 prosecution, barring the government from using at trial statements made by the defendants at GTMO to FBI “clean team” interrogators (in what amounts to a CIPA-style sanction in response to government restrictions on defense access to CIA personnel) The government in the Tanvir case (alleging that the plaintiffs were put on the… [read post]
