Search for: "State v. Pulaski County Circuit Court" Results 21 - 40 of 46
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2014, 2:56 pm by Tasha C. Taylor
Henry On September 11, 2014, the Arkansas Supreme Court affirmed the Pulaski County Circuit Court’s decision to deny a nursing-home facility’s motion to compel arbitration due to the absence of mutuality of obligation in the nursing-home facility’s admission agreement. [read post]
16 May 2014, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
 So here is an attempt to clarify where things stand procedurally in one state-- Arkansas.On May 9, an Arkansas state trial court (the Pulaski County Circuit Court which includes the city of Little Rock) held that the state's constitutional and legislative bans on same-sex marriage violate the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause. [read post]
9 May 2014, 6:13 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Pulaski County Circuit Judge Christopher Charles Piazza of Little Rock relied upon a mix of law and history to nullify the ban, in a thirteen-page opinion. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 4:58 pm by Robert Kreisman
 FCL argued that the Cook County circuit court judge gave erroneous jury instructions that made the verdict unfair. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 8:40 am by Robert Kreisman
The Illinois Appellate Court has affirmed the decision of a Cook County Circuit Court judge in a dispute that arose over a rental property. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 8:05 am by Steve Hall
Pulaski County Circuit Judge Tim Fox ruled in August that the state’s 2009 law on lethal injection procedures gives too much discretion to prison officials in choosing what chemicals to use, in violation of the separation of powers between the executive and legislative branches of government. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 9:12 am by Steve Hall
And: The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette reports a separate lawsuit in Pulaski County Circuit Court is under appeal after a judge ruled part of the 2009 execution protocol law is unconstitutional. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 4:30 am
In 2003, the plaintiff in this case, Loretta Lawson, brought an action in a Circuit Court of Pulaski County, Arkansas alleging that the defendants, Philip Morris Companies, Inc. and Philip Morris Incorporated, misrepresented the health risks of light cigarettes stating that they were less harmful than regular cigarettes in violation of various laws of different states. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 7:48 am by Tasha C. Taylor
The Arkansas Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision handed down this morning, affirmed the Pulaski County Circuit Court’s decision ruling that Act 1 is unconstitutional as a violation of fundamental privacy rights under the Arkansas Constitution. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 8:19 am by admin
County Farm Rd Wheaton, Illinois 60189-0707 Phone: 630/407-8700 Fax: 630/407-8575 Edgar Karen Halloran 115 West Court St. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 4:05 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The new case is McCreary County, et al., v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 3:30 am by Andrew M. Taylor
  Because, as discussed above, the status of the Supreme Court’s jurisdiction (original or appellate) was in doubt after the enactment of Amendment 80, the Petitioner filed nearly identical actions in the Pulaski County Circuit Court and the Arkansas Supreme Court, both on the same day. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 7:28 am by Diana L. Skaggs
Mosley, 2009-CA-000177-M4 Published: Reversing and Remanding CountyPulaski       Wife appealed circuit court’s denial of her motion to amend her response to a petition for dissolution of marriage to include a request for maintenance. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm by cdw
Upton, No. 09-8852 (5/24/2010) Circuit court impermissibly, in this pre-AEDPA, pretermitted its analysis of the state court’s factual determination of Mr. [read post]
23 May 2010, 8:41 pm by cdw
Pulaski County Circuit Ct., 2010 Ark. 224 (Ark 5/13/2010) In this capital case, public defender’s office under state statute will be required to pay for certain services despite that the defendant below retained private counsel. [read post]
18 May 2010, 8:02 pm by cdw
Pulaski County Circuit Ct., 2010 Ark. 224 (Ark 5/13/2010) In this capital case, public defender’s office under state statute will be required to pay for certain services despite that the defendant below retained private counsel. [read post]