Search for: "State v. Purvis" Results 21 - 40 of 41
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2009, 8:46 am
State, 547 So.2d 1292 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989), and Purvis v. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 11:17 am by John J. Sullivan
  There are so many families with real problems, not just power outages, and a lot to rebuild.But it’s back to work, so here’s an excellent Mensing preemption decision – Purvis v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am by Bexis
 . to comply with state law while also being in compliance with federal law”); Strayhorn v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:48 am
Purvis QC for Contour, before Floyd J in the present action,"boldly" invited the judge to take a different view because the claim had been amended. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
The extent to which the state provides information and guidance to members of the public may be relevant here: the clearer the information from the state, the lower might be the public interest in knowing the details about particular cases. [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 5:38 pm by INFORRM
Only two subsequent cases took up these dicta to find that there was a cause of action for invasion of privacy as part of the common law of Australia – Grosse v Purvis in the District Court of Queensland and Doe v Australian Broadcasting Corporation in the County Court of Victoria. [read post]
10 May 2022, 5:55 pm by Riana Pfefferkorn
With the Supreme Court poised to rip away a constitutional right that’s been the law of the land for nearly half a century by overturning Roe v. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
Launch of Westlaw UK Insight, online encyclopaedia of law Professor Stewart Purvis’ round up of the Newsnight sagas NUJ: Claudia Jones Memorial Lecture: Newcastle 2012 [video] In the Courts On 11 December 2012 judgment was handed down in the privacy case Price v Powell & Ors [2012] EWHC 3527 (QB). [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 11:32 am by Eleonora Rosati
The end result of that litigation was that both parties agreed there was a contract between them and that it was governed by the law of the state of Pennsylvania (where it had been litigated). [read post]