Search for: "State v. Quirk"
Results 21 - 40
of 287
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2010, 8:39 am
Prometheus Labs. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 9:04 am
The transition from first-to-invent to first-to-file has involved a number of quirks, the latest is found in SNIPR Technologies Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 10:00 am
Case citation: State v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 1:47 pm
Most of these states (except Ohio) aren't particularly large, but these quirks are things we'd definitely want to know if we happened to have a case originating there.State-law specific quirks - that's one reason why folks like us, who practice in "big firms," need to have local counsel. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 1:18 pm
In Natan v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 11:08 am
Warren, 678 So. 2d 324, 326 n.2 (Fla. 1996) (citing Mullis, 252 So. 2d at 238; Quirk v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 9:26 pm
More specifically, California state courts as well as federal courts in the Ninth Circuit have concluded (in light of Luther v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 4:21 pm
I’m eagerly awaiting the judgment in R(Weaver) v London & Quadrant, but, in one of those quirks of synchronicity, Bailii has just put the Court of Appeal Judgment in Donoghue v Poplar Housing & Regeneration Community Association Ltd & Anor [2001] EWCA Civ 595 up online. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 11:33 pm
Supreme Court explained in United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 9:12 pm
“Minimal [statistical] impact,” as Judge Weinstein points out in United States v. [read post]
30 May 2007, 7:06 pm
Ct. 1727 (2007), describing it as a "weird quirk. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:53 pm
Ohio's age discrimination statute of limitations has always been one of the quirks of Ohio employment law. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 2:16 pm
United States and Printz v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 3:10 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:13 am
Eric’s Comments: As Venkat says, we need a federal anti-SLAPP law to avoid these kinds of state-by-state quirks. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 10:41 pm
Simpson's criminal trial) and Opening Arguments: A Young Lawyer's First Case: United States v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 5:37 pm
The case is A-1 A-Lectricians v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 12:20 pm
State v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 6:34 am
And to suggest otherwise, as the COP does, seems to me to be a basic error in the application of the state action doctrine, unless they're arguing that banks are now state actors, via TARP (no way), or that, because of Shelley v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:14 pm
Wade but also Griswold v. [read post]
