Search for: "State v. R. G." Results 21 - 40 of 4,519
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm by vforberger
Comm’r of Labor (In re Lowry), 189 A.D.3d 1863, 138 N.Y.S.3d 238 (N.Y. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 6:50 pm
The Court concluded there were extensive human rights violations and ordered the State to provide specialized medical assistance to the victims, pay compensation for both material losses and pain and suffering, and publicly acknowledge its wrongdoing. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 6:42 pm
Vår hovedprioritet er å avdekke de alvorligste forholdene og selskapene som er nærmest knyttet til dem "] (Lederens forord/Foreword by the Council's Chair, Svein Richard Brandtzæg, 2023 Annual Report, p. 6)The Council on Ethics for the Norwegian Government Pension Fund Global has just distributed 2023 Annual Report [Etikkrådetfor Statens pensjonsfond utland; Årsmelding 2023]; English version HERE; Norwegian Version HERE (link… [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm by Katie Calogero and Daniel Alvarado
United States, the Court found the terms of the solicitation violated the SBA regulations regarding the evaluation of mentor-protégé offerors.[6] Specifically, the SBA regulations regarding mentor-protégé offerors states, “A procuring activity may not require the protégé firm to individually meet the same evaluation or responsibility criteria as that required of other offerors generally. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:40 am by Matthias Weller
More precisely Article 7 (2) of the Brussels Ia Regulation had to be interpreted, according to which a person domiciled in a Member State may be sued in another Member State, ‘in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict, in the courts for the place where the harmful event occurred or may occur’. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Cunningham & Ute Römer-Barron, Four Reasons the Supreme Court Should Reconsider Its Article III Standing Doctrine, (Forthcoming, Ohio State Law Journal Online, v. 85, 2024).Elias Neibart, M.A. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 7:17 am by Russell Knight
” 750 ILCS 5/600(g) If the move does not qualify as a “relocation” under 750 ILCS 5/600(g), just move and let the other parent know their drive to pick up their children for visitation will be that much longer. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:15 pm by Administrator
Reilly, 2021 SCC 38, at para. 3; see also R. v. [read post]