Search for: "State v. Ratner" Results 21 - 40 of 99
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2018, 4:57 pm by INFORRM
On 30 January 2018 the Court of Appeal gave the claimant permission to appeal in the case of Butt v Secretary of State for Home Department. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
Instead of veering towards such a transformation, the government decided to rely once again on its preferred model, stimulating growth through investment, exports and subsidies to state-owned enterprises (SOEs), operating outside of China on a regional scale, via BRI. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 10:52 am
[9]  ·      Should corporations be held directly accountable for protecting certain human rights, rather than only indirectly through the nation-state as the traditional bearer of human rights obligations? [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 2:56 am
Ratner Paul Williams & Laura Livingston, reviewing Lawfare: Law as a Weapon of War, by Orde F. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 5:30 am by Jimmy Chalk, Sarah Grant
The United States intervened, Lorenzana said, and was able to dissuade the Chinese from crossing what would be a “red line” for both the Philippines and the United States. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
Along with Michael Ratner and Steven Watt at the Center for Constitutional Rights, Clive was my co-counsel in Rasul v. [read post]
15 May 2016, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
The Sunday paper summarized the state of play. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 3:48 am by Elina Saxena
The European Court of Justice ruled against the Safe Harbor framework in Schrems v. [read post]