Search for: "State v. Richard P." Results 21 - 40 of 1,464
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2024, 9:19 am
 The short summary I prepared fleshes out the themes I hope to cover: Regulatory governance is well within a process of transformation from a managerial system deeply embedded in the classical model of the rule-of-law state grounded in positive (or customary) law pronounced by an authoritative body clothed in the legislative power, to the world of the panopticon and the disciplines. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 7:15 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
The 1997 PDRS was in use, and it specifically stated that its MDT was intended as a guide only. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization symposium on Richard L. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 6:42 pm
Vår hovedprioritet er å avdekke de alvorligste forholdene og selskapene som er nærmest knyttet til dem "] (Lederens forord/Foreword by the Council's Chair, Svein Richard Brandtzæg, 2023 Annual Report, p. 6)The Council on Ethics for the Norwegian Government Pension Fund Global has just distributed 2023 Annual Report [Etikkrådetfor Statens pensjonsfond utland; Årsmelding 2023]; English version HERE; Norwegian Version HERE (link… [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization symposium on Richard L. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:28 am by centerforartlaw
By Sophia Williams “We’ve filed a lawsuit challenging AI image generators for using artists’ work without consent, credit, or compensation. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 1:41 pm by Derek Muller
Harper… Continue reading The post Some thoughts on state power to conduct presidential primaries (and why the Moore v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
You are probably well acquainted with its successor, rule 506.[2] Prior to the adoption of former rule 146 in April 1974, the Commission did not have rules interpreting section 4(2) of the Securities Act.[3] As a result, issuers faced uncertainty in determining whether a sale of securities did not involve “any public offering” and in applying case law on the topic, including the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]