Search for: "State v. Ripa"
Results 21 - 40
of 63
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2019, 2:15 pm
The YouTube and Uploaded cases (C-682/18 Petersongs v YouTube and C-683/18 Elsevier v Cyando) pending from the German Federal Supreme Court include questions around the communication to the public right, as do C-392/19 VG Bild-Kunst v Preussischer Kulturbesitz(Germany, BGH), C-442/19 Brein v News Service Europe (Netherlands, Supreme Court) and C-597/19 Mircom v Telenet (Belgium).Questions about injunctions against intermediaries are also raised in… [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 9:03 am
The pending appeal in Vidal-Hall v Google. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 4:23 pm
That happened with S.94 of the Telecommunications Act 1984 and, arguably, with bulk interception under RIPA. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:58 am
That, in the form of Judicial Commissioner approval of the Secretary of State’s decision to issue a warrant, is now a feature of the Investigatory Powers Act 2016 which has superseded RIPA. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 8:06 am
The Bar Council wrote to the Home Secretary to urge the Government to consider seriously whether RIPA operates consistently in the public interest. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 4:01 pm
RIPA, DRIPA and the Counter-Terrorism and Security Bill. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
The result was RIPA. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 1:36 am
The result was RIPA. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 5:41 pm
Albermarle, LLC v. [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 11:54 pm
On 15 and 16 December 2016, there will be a public hearing of a preliminary issue in the Investigatory Powers Tribunal in the case of Dias v Chief Constable of Cleveland, a case concerning access to journalists’ communications data under RIPA. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 9:09 am
CopyrightDigital Single Market EU Member States are due to implement the Digital Copyright Directive by 7 June 2021. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 5:29 am
More recently, the Grand Chamber of the ECtHR in Zakharov v Russia stated that “the interception authorisation, … must clearly identify a specific person …or single set of premises”. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 2:07 pm
James Landolt v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 10:52 am
Since an action for rectification and removal is indivisible it cannot be brought in each Member State in which the information is or was accessible.] [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:15 pm
By a 4:3 majority the Court allowed the appeal, holding that s.67(8) of RIPA did not oust the supervisory jurisdiction of the High Court. [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 3:25 pm
Issues under consideration include whether the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights can be relied upon to justify exceptions or limitations beyond those in the Copyright Directive (Spiegel Online GmbH v Volker Beck, C-516/17; Funke Medien (Case C-469/17) (Advocate General Opinion 25 October 2018 here) and PelhamCase 476/17); and whether a link to a PDF amounts to publication for the purposes of the quotation exception (Spiegel Online GmbH v Volker Beck, C-516/17). [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 10:52 am
The Conseil d'Etat has referred various questions about this to the CJEU.Online state surveillance The UK’s Investigatory Powers Act 2016 (IP Act), partially implemented in 2016 and 2017, is expected to come fully in force in 2018. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 8:00 am
Surveillance In response to a 2015 Press Gazette investigation into police use of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA) to secretly view journalists’ call records and identify lawful confidential sources, the UK Government has admitted that its pre-2016 surveillance regime violated human rights laws. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 6:38 am
BrazilFakhoury v. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 4:24 pm
The YouTube and Uploaded cases (C-682/18 Petersongs v YouTube and C-683/18 Elsevier v Cyando) pending from the German Federal Supreme Court include questions around the communication to the public right, as do C-392/19 VG Bild-Kunst v Preussischer Kulturbesitz (Germany, BGH), C-442/19 Brein v News Service Europe (Netherlands, Supreme Court) and C-597/19 Mircom v… [read post]
