Search for: "State v. Robert D. Bates" Results 21 - 40 of 50
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2018, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At the Heritage Foundation’s SCOTUS 101 podcast, Elizabeth Slattery and Tiffany Bates “talk about a snippy exchange between John Roberts and Stephen Breyer, … they break down recent decisions and oral arguments in Janus, Microsoft, and Minnesota Voters Alliance[, and] chat with the queen of SCOTUS advocacy, Lisa Blatt. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
” At the National Conference of State Legislatures blog, Lisa Soronen looks at Weyerhaeuser Company v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
” In the Heritage Foundation’s SCOTUS 101 podcast, Elizabeth Slattery and Tiffany Bates “look at the justices’ attendance at the State of the Union, and they talk about Trump’s judicial nominations with [the Judicial Crisis Network]’s Carrie Severino. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
” At LAWnLinguistics, Neal Goldfarb parses the statutory language at issue in Husted v. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
The first was Murphy v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
” At National Review, Carrie Severino calls Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
(Baryla Decl., ¶ 6; Morris Decl., ¶ 5; Declaration of Robert Adams ISO Mot. for Preliminary Injunction, ¶ 3; Declaration of Jeffrey Mullen ISO Mot. for Preliminary Injunction, ¶¶ 3-4.) [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 6:36 am by Will Baude
Taking a page from Eugene, I thought I’d put break our argument out into three blog post this week, for those who are curious but don’t want to read through the entire PDF. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am by Benjamin Wittes
It is in this atmosphere that the idea of a national security court as a solution to the problem — an idea that for a long time existed only on the margins of the debate about U.S. counterterrorism policy but is now entertained by more mainstream thinkers such as Senator Diane Feinstein and a man I respect greatly, my former client Robert Gates – has gained momentum. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 1:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
  The answer was easy: “The United States must lead by the power of our example and not by the example of our power. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:00 am by Kevin
From a complaint filed last week in San Francisco:  Michael M ____ v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:55 pm by Joel R. Brandes
The Friedrich court was referring to In Re Bates, High Court of Justice, Family Division, Royal Courts of London, No. [read post]