Search for: "State v. Roger B."
Results 21 - 40
of 747
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2013, 4:54 am
Code § 2252A(a)(5)(B) and the judge sentenced him to “sixty months' imprisonment and eight years' supervised release”, Brian Rogers appealed. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 1:51 pm
Gagnon v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 4:53 am
District Court Judge Roger Benitez granted a preliminary injunction to prevent the State of California from enforcing AB 5 against the trucking industry, concluding that the plaintiffs in that case had met their burden to show a likelihood of succeeding on the merits with respect to their preemption claim. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 8:53 am
Importantly, after reading the various takes on United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 10:19 am
§ 2332(b) (1998). . . . [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 3:49 pm
United States. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 9:26 am
Rogers & Telus, 2016 ONSC 70 [PDF]. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
Rogers, 124 Harv. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:43 pm
Brown v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 4:23 pm
Rogers v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 8:50 am
by Roger Alford The Eleventh Circuit in United States v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 7:40 am
Opinion Issued May 17, 2007--Opinion by Judge Roger W. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 10:51 am
Rogers v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 6:53 am
[Ed also bringing RSA more in line with European decisions on this issue.]Moneyweb v Media24In a totally unrelated matter, those who have been following the fascinating Moneyweb v Media 24 dispute involving aggregation and copyright should take the time to read Roger Hislop’s well-reasoned if not somewhat polarising piece on MarkLives.com, but not before they’ve read the answering papersfiled by Media 24 in December. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:24 pm
” State v. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 9:36 am
Roger Falk won in State v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 1:21 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 9:16 am
Rogers v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 2:37 am
Supreme CourtValdes, 34 FLW 116, New dj test, 775.021(4) (b) (2) prohibits separate punishments for crimes arising from the same criminal transactions only when the statute itself provides for an offense with multiple degrees-, (4)(b)(2) offenses constitute different degree of same offenses with multiple degrees, discharging a firearm within 1000 feet of a person in violation of 790.15(2) and shooting into an occupied vehicle 790.10 same offense does not violate double jeopardy,… [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 2:23 pm
From U.S. v. [read post]
