Search for: "State v. Romano" Results 21 - 40 of 180
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2012, 1:12 pm
It is important to note that the law applies to out-of-state businesses that employ workers in the State of California. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 2:07 pm
Further, we have yet to see whether Manchester CC v Romano [2004] EWCA Civ 834 or Malcolm is favoured in possession claims where the Court has discretion. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 8:33 am by Lisa Guerin
Last week, the California Supreme Court issued a long-awaited decision in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 2:00 am by Hull and Hull LLP
Carey, finding that while summary judgment motions apply to novel causes of action, the law in Romano v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 8:38 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
As reported in Hunton & Williams' Employment & Labor Perspectives blog: A recent New York state trial court decision, Romano v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:04 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Abstract: In 2005, Roberta Romano famously described the Sarbanes-Oxley Act as “quack corporate governance. [read post]
14 Mar 2025, 6:30 am
Shareholder Activism Review 2024 and a Look Toward 2025 Posted by Dan Burch, Bob Marese, and Jillian DeMarco, MacKenzie Partners, Inc., on Wednesday, March 12, 2025 Tags: Activists, CEOs, Shareholder activism, Shareholders An Update on ESG Litigation Risks in the United States Posted by Cathy Botticelli, Rick S. [read post]