Search for: "State v. Romano" Results 21 - 40 of 178
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2012, 1:12 pm
It is important to note that the law applies to out-of-state businesses that employ workers in the State of California. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 2:07 pm
Further, we have yet to see whether Manchester CC v Romano [2004] EWCA Civ 834 or Malcolm is favoured in possession claims where the Court has discretion. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 8:33 am by Lisa Guerin
Last week, the California Supreme Court issued a long-awaited decision in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 2:00 am by Hull and Hull LLP
Carey, finding that while summary judgment motions apply to novel causes of action, the law in Romano v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 8:38 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
As reported in Hunton & Williams' Employment & Labor Perspectives blog: A recent New York state trial court decision, Romano v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:04 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Abstract: In 2005, Roberta Romano famously described the Sarbanes-Oxley Act as “quack corporate governance. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 10:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
  As each workshop approaches, we will send an email to those on our list with details concerning location and/or accessibility via Zoom.Oct. 19, 2021: Mark Krass, Stanford Law and Political ScienceDebunking the Non-Delegation Doctrine for State Regulation of Federal ElectionsNov. 2, 2021: Margarita Lila Rosa, Lecturer and Mellon Postdoctoral Fellow, Stanford Marginalia: Black Women and Emerging Carceral Geographies in Rio de Janeiro, 1880-1888Nov. 16, 2021: Sara Forsdyke,… [read post]