Search for: "State v. Ronan" Results 21 - 40 of 82
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The Week that Was: All of Lawfare in One Post
3 Oct 2021, 10:20 am by Emily Dai
United States when reading laws about computers. [read post]
Lawfare - http://www.lawfareblog.com/
Case Law: Strasbourg, Dickinson v. Turkey, Yes, Prime Minister (bis): prosecution for satirical collage violated Article 10 – Ronan Ó Fathaigh and Dirk Voorhoof
29 Mar 2021, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
Finally, the ECtHR recalls that the dominant position that State institutions occupy, requires them to exercise restraint in the use of criminal proceedings such as in cases to protect the reputation of the Prime Minister as a representative of the State. [read post]
Inforrm\'s Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/
Arizona District Court Holds “Reasonable” Medical Expenses Are Amounts Accepted by Providers as Payment in Full Rather Than Billed Amounts
15 Oct 2020, 8:34 am by Nathan Meyer
Co. v. [read post]
Arizona Bad Faith Blawg - http://arizonabadfaithblawg.com/
Arizona District Court Holds “Reasonable” Medical Expenses Are Amounts Accepted by Providers as Payment in Full Rather Than Billed Amounts
15 Oct 2020, 8:34 am by Nathan Meyer
Co. v. [read post]
Arizona Bad Faith Blawg - http://arizonabadfaithblawg.com/
Global Freedom of Expression, Columbia University: Newsletter
14 Aug 2020, 6:45 am by INFORRM
United StatesJordahl v. [read post]
Inforrm\'s Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/
Case Law, Strasbourg: Macovei v Romania, Defamation proceedings against Romanian MEP over anti-corruption comments violated Article 10 – Ronan Ó Fathaigh and Dirk Voorhoof
11 Aug 2020, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
The Court stated it was ‘not persuaded’ by the appeal courts’ approach, and ‘cannot share their conclusion’. [read post]
Inforrm\'s Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/
Case Law, Strasbourg: Centre for Democracy and Rule of Law v Ukraine, Refusal to give access to ‘confidential’ information about politicians violated Article 10 – Ronan Ó Fathaigh and Dirk Voorhoof
2 May 2020, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
Centre for Democracy and the Rule of Law v. [read post]
Inforrm\'s Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/
Global Freedom of Expression, Columbia University: Newsletter
30 Apr 2020, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
SpainDario v. [read post]
Inforrm\'s Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/
Case Law, Strasbourg: Studio Monitori v. Georgia: access to public documents must be ‘instrumental’ for the right to freedom of expression – Dirk Voorhoof and Ronan Ó Fathaigh
27 Mar 2020, 5:45 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Studio Monitori and Others v. [read post]
Inforrm\'s Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/
The Myth v. Harvey Weinstein
21 Feb 2020, 4:54 am by SHG
Despite all of this and despite the presumed lens through which Wypijewski walked into the courtroom in the trial of The People of the State of New York v. [read post]
Simple Justice - http://blog.simplejustice.us
Case Law, Strasbourg: Tagiyev and Huseynov v. Azerbaijan, Journalist and editor’s conviction for incitement to religious hatred violated Article 10 – Ronan Ó Fathaigh and Dirk Voorhoof
22 Dec 2019, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
In Tagiyev and Huseynov v. [read post]
Inforrm\'s Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/
Global Freedom of Expression, Columbia University: Newsletter
9 Nov 2019, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Community Highlights and Recent News ● Global Freedom of Expression experts Dirk Voorhoof and Ronan Ó Fathaigh have published an analysis of the recent ECtHR ruling Szurovecz v. [read post]
Inforrm\'s Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/
Case Law, Strasbourg: Szurovecz v. Hungary, Denying journalist access to asylum-seeker ‘reception centre’ violated Article 10 – Dirk Voorhoof and Ronan Ó Fathaigh
6 Nov 2019, 4:44 am by INFORRM
In Szurovecz v. [read post]
Inforrm\'s Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/
Law and Media Round Up – 21 October 2019
21 Oct 2019, 12:15 am by INFORRM
There is an Inforrm case comment by Ronan O Fathaigh and Dirk Voorhoof. [read post]
Inforrm\'s Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/
The demise of the UK’s current age-verification plans for online pornand what that might mean for Ireland – Eoin O’Dell
18 Oct 2019, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
As Ronan Lupton pointed out to me on twitter, implementation may not be too far away: the incoming President of the Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, has committed to the introduction of a new EU Digital Services Act to “upgrade … safety rules for digital platforms, services and products” (pdf; p13). [read post]
Inforrm\'s Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/
Case Law, Strasbourg: Gürbüz and Bayar v. Turkey, Dangerous “triple pirouette” to find criminal prosecution for media coverage of PKK statements did not violate Article 10 – Ronan Ó Fathaigh and Dirk Voorhoof
16 Oct 2019, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
The Court in Gürbüz and Bayar v. [read post]
Inforrm\'s Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/
Live Blog Day 3: R (Miller) v Prime Minister; Cherry & Ors v Advocate General for Scotland
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am by CMS
Requests Ronan Lavery QC not abuse Lady Hale’s politeness. 11:27: Ronan Lavery QC submits the Government’s policy would be constitutional. [read post]
UK Supreme Court Blog - http://ukscblog.com/
Case Law, Strasbourg: Brzeziński v. Poland: Fine over ‘false’ information during election campaign violated Article 10 – Ronan Ó Fathaigh
15 Aug 2019, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
Similarly, in Kita v. [read post]
Inforrm\'s Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/
Law and Media Round Up – 1 July 2019
30 Jun 2019, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Mozilla stated that all adverts across the internet would change to be tailored to the profile chosen. [read post]
Inforrm\'s Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/
Case Law, Strasbourg: Prior restraint of campaigning for a peaceful but unauthorised demonstration violated Article 10 – Ronan Ó Fathaigh and Dirk Voorhoof
18 May 2019, 3:10 am by INFORRM
On 30 April 2019, in Kablis v. [read post]
Inforrm\'s Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/